These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12564670)

  • 1. Promoting repeat mammography use: insights from a systematic needs assessment.
    Partin MR; Slater JS
    Health Educ Behav; 2003 Feb; 30(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 12564670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baseline predictors of initiation vs. maintenance of regular mammography use among rural women.
    Rauscher GH; Hawley ST; Earp JA
    Prev Med; 2005 Jun; 40(6):822-30. PubMed ID: 15850884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results.
    Partin MR; Slater JS; Caplan L
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):734-40. PubMed ID: 16043216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Barriers to breast cancer screening in a managed care population.
    Parkington SR; Faine N; Nguyen MC; Lowry MT; Virginkar PA
    Manag Care; 2009 Apr; 18(4):34-45. PubMed ID: 19472566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring mammography compliance: lessons learned from a survival analysis of screening behavior.
    Partin MR; Casey-Paal AL; Slater JS; Korn JE
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1998 Aug; 7(8):681-7. PubMed ID: 9718220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use.
    Yabroff KR; Mandelblatt JS
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Sep; 8(9):749-57. PubMed ID: 10498393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles.
    Bastani R; Marcus AC; Maxwell AE; Das IP; Yan KX
    Prev Med; 1994 Jan; 23(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 8016038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-retest reliability of self-reported mammography in women veterans.
    Rivera S; Vernon SW; Tiro JA; Coan S; Del Junco D; Chan W; Coker A
    Prev Med; 2006 Apr; 42(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 16442154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control in a National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: women's satisfaction with the mammography process.
    Almog R; Hagoel L; Tamir A; Barnett O; Rennert G
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 18319148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stages of change: Korean women's attitudes and barriers toward mammography screening.
    Kang HS; Thomas E; Kwon BE; Hyun MS; Jun EM
    Health Care Women Int; 2008 Feb; 29(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 18350421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Bobo JK; Shapiro JA; Schulman J; Wolters CL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Apr; 13(4):620-30. PubMed ID: 15066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of a telephone counseling intervention on transitions in stage of change and adherence to interval mammography screening (United States).
    Carney PA; Harwood BG; Greene MA; Goodrich ME
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Sep; 16(7):799-807. PubMed ID: 16132790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeat mammography: prevalence estimates and considerations for assessment.
    Clark MA; Rakowski W; Bonacore LB
    Ann Behav Med; 2003 Dec; 26(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 14644696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A combined approach to women's health is associated with a greater likelihood of repeat mammography in a population of financially disadvantaged women.
    Gregory-Mercado KY; Will J; True S; Royalty J; Starcher ET; Khavjou O; Helsel W; Kammerer W; Howe W
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2007 Oct; 4(4):A89. PubMed ID: 17875264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mammography facility characteristics and repeat mammography use among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Engelman KK; Ellerbeck EF; Mayo MS; Markello SJ; Ahluwalia JS
    Prev Med; 2004 Sep; 39(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 15313088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors associated with repeat mammography screening.
    Halabi S; Skinner CS; Samsa GP; Strigo TS; Crawford YS; Rimer BK
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1104-12. PubMed ID: 11132060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
    Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers by stage of mammography adoption.
    Champion VL; Skinner CS
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Apr; 12(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 12804358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with the incompliance with mammogram screening among individuals with a family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer.
    Wu H; Zhu K; Jatoi I; Shah M; Shriver CD; Potter J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Mar; 101(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16821080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.