These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1256545)
1. Correspondence between sharp tuning and two-tone inhibition in primary auditory neurones. Robertson D Nature; 1976 Feb; 259(5543):477-8. PubMed ID: 1256545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Function of the olivocochlear system. Pfalz KJ Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1973; 20():311-5. PubMed ID: 4710514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig. Mulders WH; Robertson D Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 15309356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatiotemporal response patterns in populations of cochlear nerve fibers: single- and two-tone studies. Kim DO Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():68-78. PubMed ID: 6575673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory adaptation in nerve action potentials recorded from the cochlea in guinea pigs. SORENSEN H Acta Otolaryngol; 1959; 50():438-50. PubMed ID: 13832878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Olivo-cochlear inhibition during physostigmine-induced activity in the pontine reticular formation in the decerebrate cat. Kingsley RE; Barnes CD Exp Neurol; 1973 Jul; 40(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 4351633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of compound action potential responses to tone bursts in the human and guinea pig cochlea. Eggermont JJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 Nov; 60(5):1132-9. PubMed ID: 977839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Activity patterns of neurons in the peripheral auditory system of some reptiles. Manley GA Brain Behav Evol; 1974; 10(1-3):244-56. PubMed ID: 4455354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuous low level sound alters cochlear mechanics: an efferent effect? Brown AM Hear Res; 1988 Jul; 34(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 3403383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cochlear potentials in the prenatal period in guinea pigs]. Romand R; Granier MR; Pujol R J Physiol (Paris); 1971; 63(6):280A-281A. PubMed ID: 5152297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Physical interactions between 2 sounds in the cochlea and neural inhibitions]. Legouix JP; Remond MC; Greenbaum HB J Physiol (Paris); 1972 Oct; 65():Suppl:259A. PubMed ID: 4649939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear adaptation, central influences. Kupperman R Acta Otolaryngol; 1972; 73(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 5015147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of section of the medial efferent tracts (crossed and uncrossed) on cochlear frequency selectivity. Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R Hear Res; 1986; 24(3):285-7. PubMed ID: 3793644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new rapid component in the cochlear response to brief electrical efferent stimulation: CM and otoacoustic observations. Kemp DT; Souter M Hear Res; 1988 Jul; 34(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 3403385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise. Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Compound action potential of the cochlear nerve evoked electrically. Electrophysiological study of the acoustic nerve (guinea pig). Nagel D Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1974; 206(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 4479079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Relation between the waveform of the cochlear whole nerve action potential and its intensity function. Legouiz JP; Teas DC; Beagley HA; Remond MC Acta Otolaryngol; 1978; 85(3-4):177-83. PubMed ID: 636867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Properties of derived cochlear action potentials in forward tonal masking in guinea pigs. Al'tman YA; Nikitin NI Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2000; 30(5):587-98. PubMed ID: 11037152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on temporary threshold shifts in auditory sensitivity. I. Dependence on electrical stimulation parameters. Rajan R J Neurophysiol; 1988 Aug; 60(2):549-68. PubMed ID: 3171641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea in human subjects. Starr A; Brackmann DE Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979; 88(4 Pt 1):550-6. PubMed ID: 475255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]