These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12566197)
1. Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries. Chong ES; Mongelli M Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Feb; 80(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 12566197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attitude and preference of Thai pregnant women towards mode of delivery. Yamasmit W; Chaithongwongwatthana S J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 May; 95(5):619-24. PubMed ID: 22994018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system. Dweik D; Girasek E; Töreki A; Mészáros G; Pál A Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Apr; 93(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 24575805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women. Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjærven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16():230. PubMed ID: 27535233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-pregnant patients' preference for delivery route. Thurman AR; Zoller JS; Swift SE Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(5):308-12. PubMed ID: 15580415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preferred Route of Delivery of Thai Pregnant Women. Kovavisarach E; Sukontaman W J Med Assoc Thai; 2017 Feb; 100 Suppl 1():S131-5. PubMed ID: 29927231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Bergholt T; Østberg B; Legarth J; Weber T Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Mar; 83(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 14995922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women. Yee LM; Kaimal AJ; Houston KA; Wu E; Thiet MP; Nakagawa S; Caughey AB; Firouzian A; Kuppermann M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 212(3):377.e1-24. PubMed ID: 25446662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Requesting cesareans without medical indications: an option being considered by young canadian women. Gallagher F; Bell L; Waddell G; Benoît A; Côté N Birth; 2012 Mar; 39(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 22369604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maternal expectations and birth-related experiences: a survey of pregnant women of mixed parity from Calcutta, India. Hug I; Chattopadhyay C; Mitra GR; Kar Mahapatra RM; Schneider MC Int J Obstet Anesth; 2008 Apr; 17(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 18295472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of a computerized decision aid on empowering pregnant women for choosing vaginal versus cesarean section delivery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Eslami S; Aslani A; Tara F; Ghalichi L; Erfanian F; Abu-Hanna A Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():549. PubMed ID: 26634922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Delivery preferences of pregnant women: Do not underestimate the effect of friends and relatives. Kosan Z; Kavuncuoglu D; Calıkoglu EO; Aras A J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 48(6):395-400. PubMed ID: 30904490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's knowledge and attitude towards mode of delivery and frequency of cesarean section on mother's request in six public and private hospitals in Tehran, Iran, 2012. Ghotbi F; Akbari Sene A; Azargashb E; Shiva F; Mohtadi M; Zadehmodares S; Farzaneh F; Yasai FA J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1257-66. PubMed ID: 24689693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request. Arikan DC; Ozer A; Arikan I; Coskun A; Kiran H Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 20872227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean section: does it really prevent the development of postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A prospective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery. Groutz A; Rimon E; Peled S; Gold R; Pauzner D; Lessing JB; Gordon D Neurourol Urodyn; 2004; 23(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 14694448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran. Rajabi A; Maharlouei N; Rezaianzadeh A; Rajaeefard A; Keshavarzi S; Lankarani KB; Gholami A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3622-8. PubMed ID: 26753876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations. Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want? Fuglenes D; Aas E; Botten G; Øian P; Kristiansen IS Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 120(2 Pt 1):252-60. PubMed ID: 22825082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]