224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12566882)
21. Stimulus parameters for goldmann kinetic perimetry in nonorganic visual loss.
Ebneter A; Pellanda N; Kunz A; Mojon S; Mojon DS
Ophthalmologica; 2010; 224(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19738396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of Optical Defocus on the Kinetic Perimetry in Young Myopic Participants.
Hirasawa K; Shoji N
Curr Eye Res; 2015; 40(8):847-52. PubMed ID: 25271870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of stimulus velocity in automated kinetic perimetry in young healthy participants.
Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Okada A; Takano K; Tomioka S
Vision Res; 2014 May; 98():83-8. PubMed ID: 24705075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing In Children (OPTIC): Normative Visual Field Values in Children.
Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
Ophthalmology; 2015 Aug; 122(8):1711-7. PubMed ID: 26072348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The use of semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) to monitor advanced glaucomatous visual field loss.
Nevalainen J; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Vonthein R; Johnson CA; Schiefer U
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 246(9):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18563431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children.
Wilscher S; Wabbels B; Lorenz B
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 248(10):1493-500. PubMed ID: 20232076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of kinetic programs in various automated perimeters.
Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Eura M; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 61(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 28444485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of internal carotid endarterectomy on visual fields: a non-randomised prospective cohort study in Austria.
Konstantiniuk P; Steinbrugger I; Koter S; Muehlsteiner J; Wedrich A; Cohnert T
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017027. PubMed ID: 29042384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Functional field score: the effect of using a Goldmann V-4e isopter instead of a Goldmann III-4e isopter.
Langelaan M; Wouters B; Moll AC; de Boer MR; van Rens GH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1817-23. PubMed ID: 16638986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vigabatrin-associated visual field constriction in a longitudinal series. Reversibility suggested after drug withdrawal.
Fledelius HC
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2003 Feb; 81(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12631018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm (program k) for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Takada S; Arimura-Koike E; Shimomura Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 56(3):2092-9. PubMed ID: 25744980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlation between Goldmann perimetry and maximal electroretinogram response in retinitis pigmentosa.
Iannaccone A; Rispoli E; Vingolo EM; Onori P; Steindl K; Rispoli D; Pannarale MR
Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 90(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 7497885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Visual field area on the Goldmann hemispheric perimeter surface. Correction of cartographic errors inherent in perimetry.
Kirkham TH; Meyer E
Curr Eye Res; 1981; 1(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 7297100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma.
Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(2):868-875. PubMed ID: 28159974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): evaluation of kinetic approaches in childhood neuro-ophthalmic disease.
Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 103(8):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 30232171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers.
Parrish RK; Schiffman J; Anderson DR
Arch Ophthalmol; 1984 Oct; 102(10):1497-502. PubMed ID: 6487115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Peripheral visual field testing in glaucoma by automated kinetic perimetry with the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
Ballon BJ; Echelman DA; Shields MB; Ollie AR
Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 110(12):1730-2. PubMed ID: 1463413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of manual kinetic and automated static perimetry in obtaining ptosis fields.
Riemann CD; Hanson S; Foster JA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 118(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10636416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Periphery kinetic perimetry: clinically feasible to complement central static perimetry.
Ma X; Tang L; Chen X; Zeng L
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):343. PubMed ID: 34551740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
