128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12567164)
21. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women attending family planning clinics. A cost-effectiveness analysis of three strategies.
Howell MR; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA
Ann Intern Med; 1998 Feb; 128(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 9471930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Epidemiology and natural history of ligase chain reaction detected chlamydial and gonococcal infections.
Kissin DM; Holman S; Minkoff HL; DeMeo L; McCormack WM; DeHovitz JA
Sex Transm Infect; 2002 Jun; 78(3):208-9. PubMed ID: 12238656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Ligase chain reaction testing of pooled urine specimens to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infection].
Sánchez-Alemán MA; Gutiérrez JP; Bertozzi SM; Frontela-Noda M; Guerrero-Lemus V; Conde-González CJ
Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(4):548-54. PubMed ID: 16315639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The 'real-world' impact of improved diagnostic techniques for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Glasgow.
Scoular A; McCartney R; Kinn S; Carr S; Walker A
Commun Dis Public Health; 2001 Sep; 4(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 11732360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Urine as a diagnostic specimen for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Malaysia by ligase chain reaction.
Gaydos CA; Ngeow YF; Lee HH; Canavaggio M; Welsh LE; Johanson J; Quinn TC
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(5):402-6. PubMed ID: 8885072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness of partner pharmacotherapy in screening women for asymptomatic infection with Chlamydia Trachomatis.
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Jager HC; Coutinho RA
Value Health; 2001; 4(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 11705188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis using cervical swabs, urine, and self-obtained vaginal swabs in a sexually transmitted disease clinic setting.
Blake DR; Maldeis N; Barnes MR; Hardick A; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Jul; 35(7):649-55. PubMed ID: 18461013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prevalence of genital chlamydial infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic Jordanian patients.
Awwad ZM; Al-Amarat AA; Shehabi AA
Int J Infect Dis; 2003 Sep; 7(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 14563224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Low prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis by urinary ligase chain reaction in women patients in the emergency department.
Doezema D; Hepworth E; Young SA; Arguelles CA; Brillman JC; Tandberg D
Acad Emerg Med; 2002 Jun; 9(6):646-9. PubMed ID: 12045084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Universal screening or prophylactic treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among women seeking induced abortions: which strategy is more cost-effective?
Chen S; Li J; van den Hoek A
Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Apr; 34(4):230-6. PubMed ID: 17414068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening.
Land JA; Van Bergen JE; Morré SA; Postma MJ
Hum Reprod Update; 2010; 16(2):189-204. PubMed ID: 19828674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reappraising the value of urine leukocyte esterase testing in the age of nucleic acid amplification.
Bowden FJ
Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Jul; 25(6):322-6. PubMed ID: 9662768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Noninvasive tests for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: application of ligase chain reaction to first-catch urine specimens of women.
Schachter J; Moncada J; Whidden R; Shaw H; Bolan G; Burczak JD; Lee HH
J Infect Dis; 1995 Nov; 172(5):1411-4. PubMed ID: 7594691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-effectiveness of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based dynamic approach.
Welte R; Kretzschmar M; Leidl R; van den Hoek A; Jager JC; Postma MJ
Sex Transm Dis; 2000 Oct; 27(9):518-29. PubMed ID: 11034526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The program cost and cost-effectiveness of screening men for Chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease in women.
Gift TL; Gaydos CA; Kent CK; Marrazzo JM; Rietmeijer CA; Schillinger JA; Dunne EF
Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Nov; 35(11 Suppl):S66-75. PubMed ID: 18830137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: results of a multicenter cohort study.
Whittington WL; Kent C; Kissinger P; Oh MK; Fortenberry JD; Hillis SE; Litchfield B; Bolan GA; St Louis ME; Farley TA; Handsfield HH
Sex Transm Dis; 2001 Feb; 28(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11234786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
Ridgway GL; Mumtaz G; Robinson AJ; Franchini M; Carder C; Burczak J; Lee H
J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 8655675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens.
de Barbeyrac B; Rodriguez P; Dutilh B; Le Roux P; Bébéar C
Genitourin Med; 1995 Dec; 71(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 8566978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An economic evaluation of a school-based sexually transmitted disease screening program.
Wang LY; Burstein GR; Cohen DA
Sex Transm Dis; 2002 Dec; 29(12):737-45. PubMed ID: 12466713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
