BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12568989)

  • 1. GM-CSF versus G-CSF: engraftment characteristics, resource utilization, and cost following autologous PBSC transplantation.
    Zumberg MS; Leather HL; Nejame C; Meyer C; Wingard JR
    Cytotherapy; 2002; 4(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 12568989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
    Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hematopoietic growth factor after autologous peripheral blood transplantation: comparison of G-CSF and GM-CSF.
    Jansen J; Thompson EM; Hanks S; Greenspan AR; Thompson JM; Dugan MJ; Akard LP
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jun; 23(12):1251-6. PubMed ID: 10414911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cytokine-primed bone marrow stem cells vs. peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation: a randomized comparison of GM-CSF vs. G-CSF.
    Weisdorf D; Miller J; Verfaillie C; Burns L; Wagner J; Blazar B; Davies S; Miller W; Hannan P; Steinbuch M; Ramsay N; McGlave P
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 1997 Oct; 3(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 9360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized comparison of G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy.
    Spitzer G; Adkins D; Mathews M; Velasquez W; Bowers C; Dunphy F; Kronmueller N; Niemeyer R; McIntyre W; Petruska P
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Dec; 20(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 9422470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells.
    Hohaus S; Martin H; Wassmann B; Egerer G; Haus U; Färber L; Burger KJ; Goldschmidt H; Hoelzer D; Haas R
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Oct; 22(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 9818688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
    Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
    Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature.
    Jacoub JF; Suryadevara U; Pereyra V; Colón D; Fontelonga A; Mackintosh FR; Hall SW; Ascensão JL
    Exp Hematol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 17046563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and engraftment kinetics following autologous transplantation in children and adolescents with solid tumor.
    Watanabe H; Watanabe T; Suzuya H; Wakata Y; Kaneko M; Onishi T; Okamoto Y; Abe T; Kawano Y; Kagami S; Takaue Y
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 16489358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.
    Alegre A; Tomás JF; Martínez-Chamorro C; Gil-Fernández JJ; Fernández-Villalta MJ; Arranz R; Díaz MA; Granda A; Bernardo MR; Escudero A; López-Lorenzo JL; Fernández-Rañada JM
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Aug; 20(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9257889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CD34+ dose-driven administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy in lymphoma patients.
    Todisco E; Castagna L; Sarina B; Mazza R; Magagnoli M; Balzarotti M; Nozza A; Siracusano L; Timofeeva I; Anastasia A; Demarco M; Santoro A
    Eur J Haematol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 17313558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose ifosfamide + GM-CSF vs high-dose cyclophosphamide + GM-CSF for blood progenitor cell mobilization.
    Vela-Ojeda J; Tripp-Villanueva F; Montiel-Cervantes L; Sánchez-Cortés E; Ayala-Sánchez M; Guevara-Moreno ME; García-León LD; Rosas-Cabral A; Esparza MA; González-Llaven J
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Jun; 25(11):1141-6. PubMed ID: 10849526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized trial comparing the combination of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of dendritic cell subsets in hematopoietic progenitor cell products.
    Lonial S; Hicks M; Rosenthal H; Langston A; Redei I; Torre C; Duenzl M; Feinstein B; Cherry J; Waller EK
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Dec; 10(12):848-57. PubMed ID: 15570253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of concurrent G-CSF + GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children with malignant disease.
    Madero L; González-Vicent M; Molina J; Madero R; Quintero V; Díaz MA
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Aug; 26(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 10982281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective randomized comparative observation of single- versus split-dose lenograstim to enhance engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Jang G; Ko OB; Kim S; Lee DH; Huh J; Suh C
    Transfusion; 2008 Apr; 48(4):640-6. PubMed ID: 18194384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delayed G-CSF after autologous progenitor cell transplantation: a prospective randomized trial.
    Bolwell BJ; Pohlman B; Andresen S; Kalaycio M; Goormastic M; Wise K; Wakeling A; Dannley R; Overmoyer B
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Feb; 21(4):369-73. PubMed ID: 9509971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. G-CSF primed peripheral blood progenitor cells in autologous bone marrow transplantation: parameters affecting bone marrow engraftment.
    Bolwell BJ; Fishleder A; Andresen SW; Lichtin AE; Koo A; Yanssens T; Burwell R; Baucco P; Green R
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1993 Dec; 12(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 7511016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of G-CSF with GM-CSF for mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells and for enhancing marrow recovery after autologous bone marrow transplant.
    Bolwell BJ; Goormastic M; Yanssens T; Dannley R; Baucco P; Fishleder A
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1994 Dec; 14(6):913-8. PubMed ID: 7536072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Engraftment with peripheral blood stem cells using noncontrolled-rate cryopreservation: comparison with autologous bone marrow transplantation.
    Rosenfeld CS; Gremba C; Shadduck RK; Zeigler ZR; Nemunaitis J
    Exp Hematol; 1994 Mar; 22(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 7509292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.