BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12569223)

  • 1. Effect of monitor placement and of activity setting on the MTI accelerometer output.
    Yngve A; Nilsson A; Sjostrom M; Ekelund U
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Feb; 35(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 12569223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A validation of a physical activity monitor for young and older adults.
    Nichols JF; Patterson P; Early T
    Can J Sport Sci; 1992 Dec; 17(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 1330268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Walking and running energy expenditure estimated by Caltrac and indirect calorimetry.
    Haymes EM; Byrnes WC
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Dec; 25(12):1365-9. PubMed ID: 8107543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration of accelerometer output for ambulatory adults with multiple sclerosis.
    Motl RW; Snook EM; Agiovlasitis S; Suh Y
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 Oct; 90(10):1778-84. PubMed ID: 19801071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.
    Puyau MR; Adolph AL; Vohra FA; Butte NF
    Obes Res; 2002 Mar; 10(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 11886937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of MTI accelerometer cut-points for predicting time spent in physical activity.
    Strath SJ; Bassett DR; Swartz AM
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 May; 24(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 12784173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive validity of three ActiGraph energy expenditure equations for children.
    Trost SG; Way R; Okely AD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Feb; 38(2):380-7. PubMed ID: 16531910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Field validation of the MTI Actigraph and BodyMedia armband monitor using the IDEEA monitor.
    Welk GJ; McClain JJ; Eisenmann JC; Wickel EE
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2007 Apr; 15(4):918-28. PubMed ID: 17426327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry.
    Kumahara H; Schutz Y; Ayabe M; Yoshioka M; Yoshitake Y; Shindo M; Ishii K; Tanaka H
    Br J Nutr; 2004 Feb; 91(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 14756909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory calibration and validation of the Biotrainer and Actitrac activity monitors.
    Welk GJ; Almeida J; Morss G
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Jun; 35(6):1057-64. PubMed ID: 12783056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running.
    Brage S; Wedderkopp N; Franks PW; Andersen LB; Froberg K
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Aug; 35(8):1447-54. PubMed ID: 12900703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer.
    Bouten CV; Westerterp KR; Verduin M; Janssen JD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Dec; 26(12):1516-23. PubMed ID: 7869887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual calibration for estimating free-living walking speed using the MTI monitor.
    Barnett A; Cerin E
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Apr; 38(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 16679994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field evaluation of the Computer Science and Application's Inc. Activity monitor during running and skating training in adolescent athletes.
    Ekelund U; Yngve A; Sjöström M; Westerterp K
    Int J Sports Med; 2000 Nov; 21(8):586-92. PubMed ID: 11156280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision and accuracy of an ankle-worn accelerometer-based pedometer in step counting and energy expenditure.
    Foster RC; Lanningham-Foster LM; Manohar C; McCrady SK; Nysse LJ; Kaufman KR; Padgett DJ; Levine JA
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):778-83. PubMed ID: 16125760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new 2-regression model for the Actical accelerometer.
    Crouter SE; Bassett DR
    Br J Sports Med; 2008 Mar; 42(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 17761786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ambulatory physical activity, disease severity, and employment status in adult women with osteoarthritis of the hip.
    Hirata S; Ono R; Yamada M; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Hasuda K; Kurosaka M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 May; 33(5):939-45. PubMed ID: 16652424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tracmor system for measuring walking energy expenditure.
    Levine J; Melanson EL; Westerterp KR; Hill JO
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2003 Sep; 57(9):1176-80. PubMed ID: 12947439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ability of different physical activity monitors to detect movement during treadmill walking.
    Leenders NY; Nelson TE; Sherman WM
    Int J Sports Med; 2003 Jan; 24(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 12582951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Energy cost in children assessed by multisensor activity monitors.
    Arvidsson D; Slinde F; Larsson S; Hulthén L
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Mar; 41(3):603-11. PubMed ID: 19204590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.