These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1256962)

  • 21. The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability.
    Tolkmitt FJ; Lunn SE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 4742381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of same-different judgment of two adjacent letters.
    Krueger LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 98(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 4705627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of identity in the multiletter matching task.
    Taylor DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Aug; 2(3):417-28. PubMed ID: 993746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of interpolated tasks on latency and accuracy of intramodal and cross-modal shape recognition by children.
    Millar S
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):170-5. PubMed ID: 5083121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Form discrimination: features or invariants?
    Smets GJ; Stappers PJ; Kröse BJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):311-7. PubMed ID: 3211686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Why a Y is not a V: a new look at the distinctive features of letters.
    Naus MJ; Shillman RJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Aug; 2(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 993744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual serial search across number and letter sets.
    McCarthy SV
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Aug; 43(1):311-4. PubMed ID: 958832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perception of letters, words, and nonwords.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Oct; 100(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 4745464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning.
    Reicher GM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):522-30. PubMed ID: 1011001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of task, selection set, and dispersion of attention on visual identification time.
    Schioldborg P; Paus E; Myhre G
    Scand J Psychol; 1973; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 4759282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of structural diagnostics in recognition.
    Fox J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Feb; 104(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 1141836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving perception of letters and visual structure of language.
    Nelson TM; Nilsson TH; Piercey DJ; Johnson T; Frascara J; Silva Delano S; Susuki Sone E; Villalon Bravo M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):515-30. PubMed ID: 10483645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age at onset of blindness in visual imagery development.
    Marmor GS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1031-4. PubMed ID: 604875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of nonretarded and mentally retarded children on a perceptual learning task.
    Terry PR; Samuels SJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1976 Sep; 81(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 970415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overcoming the effect of letter confusability in letter-by-letter reading: a rehabilitation study.
    Harris L; Olson A; Humphreys G
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2013; 23(3):429-62. PubMed ID: 23452100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemispheric differences in the visual analysis of the verbal and non-verbal material in children.
    Jablonowska K; Budohoska W
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1976; 36(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 1024464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A letter visual-similarity matrix for Latin-based alphabets.
    Simpson IC; Mousikou P; Montoya JM; Defior S
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):431-9. PubMed ID: 23055176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laws of visual choice reaction time.
    Teichner WH; Krebs MJ
    Psychol Rev; 1974 Jan; 81(1):75-98. PubMed ID: 4812881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pigeon perception of letters of the alphabet.
    Blough DS
    Science; 1982 Oct; 218(4570):397-8. PubMed ID: 7123242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.