These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12569920)
1. Research integrity. Ryan KJ Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 12569920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Definition of research misconduct: problem on "definition" or "user"? Wiwanitkit S; Wiwanitkit V Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Jun; 20(2):615. PubMed ID: 24065620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The case of Vipul Bhrigu and the federal definition of research misconduct. Rasmussen LM Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Jun; 20(2):411-21. PubMed ID: 24002821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits. Loikith L; Bauchwitz R Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Aug; 22(4):1027-1049. PubMed ID: 27349911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal). Chubin DE Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches. Pascal CB Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Life After Research Misconduct. Galbraith KL J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 28220722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Due process in investigations of research misconduct. Mello MM; Brennan TA N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Arizona professor files lawsuit after being fired for misconduct. Dalton R Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):817. PubMed ID: 9732854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific reasoning and due process. Guenin LM; Davis BD Sci Eng Ethics; 1996 Jan; 2(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11657786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Office of Scientific Integrity investigations: the importance of data analysis. Price AA; Hallum JV Account Res; 1992; 2(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 16144092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo. Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct in US health service. Choo V Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Noted finding of science fraud is overturned by a federal panel. N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():1, 20. PubMed ID: 11647108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scientific misconduct. Baylor saga comes to an end. Kaiser J Science; 1999 Feb; 283(5405):1091. PubMed ID: 10075561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]