171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12569921)
1. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
Pascal CB
Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. What to do about scientific misconduct.
Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
Palca J
Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The American experience: lessons learned.
Rhoades LJ
Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 11273443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The 'Gallo case': Popovic strikes back.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5302):920-1. PubMed ID: 9053992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An end to fraud?
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.
Pascal CB
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 11657856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Findings of scientific misconduct; notice.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Secretary
Fed Regist; 1993 Jun; 58(117):33830-2. PubMed ID: 11645231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
Klein DF
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
Steinberg NA
South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientific misconduct. Baylor saga comes to an end.
Kaiser J
Science; 1999 Feb; 283(5405):1091. PubMed ID: 10075561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4966):240-2. PubMed ID: 2374923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
Gavaghan H
Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office--perhaps a new leaf.
Rennie D; Gunsalus CK
JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(7):915-7. PubMed ID: 8426452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct.
Guston DH
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):137-54. PubMed ID: 11657850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
