These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct. Marwick C JAMA; 1992 Aug; 268(7):848. PubMed ID: 1640594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Research ethics. Query by Congress halts new policy. Kaiser J Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5509):1679-80. PubMed ID: 11253177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity. Needleman HL Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct. Marwick C JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Scientific misconduct: the lessons of time. Commentary on "The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: scientific misconduct and beyond" (C. Pascal). Chubin DE Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 11657857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers. Marwick C JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct. Reynolds GH Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Imanishi-Kari case. Baltimore defends paper at center of misconduct case. Stone R Science; 1995 Jul; 269(5221):157. PubMed ID: 7618074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Federal actions against plagiarism in research. Price AR J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Spring helps research integrity report resurface. Marwick C JAMA; 1996 Mar; 275(10):746. PubMed ID: 8598578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity. Rennie D BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1726-8. PubMed ID: 9614029 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Scientific misconduct in US health service. Choo V Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8961):1359. PubMed ID: 11644692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The aftermath of the Gallo case. Anderson C Science; 1994 Jan; 263(5143):20-2. PubMed ID: 8272861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI. Anderson C Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]