These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Peer review: challenging the gold standard. Smith ER Can J Cardiol; 2003 Mar; 19(3):315-6. PubMed ID: 12677291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Publishing medical research: a marketplace on the commons. Frey JJ; Phillips WR Ann Fam Med; 2013; 11(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 23508595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Should we ditch impact factors? Hobbs R BMJ; 2007 Mar; 334(7593):569. PubMed ID: 17363828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Should we ditch impact factors? Williams G BMJ; 2007 Mar; 334(7593):568. PubMed ID: 17363827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bias in the trial and reporting of trials of homeopathy: a fundamental breakdown in peer review and standards? Frass M; Schuster E; Muchitsch I; Duncan J; Gei W; Kozel G; Kastinger-Mayr C; Felleitner AE; Reiter C; Endler C; Oberbaum M J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):780-2. PubMed ID: 16296904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. With a little help from my friends. Ambrosino N Pulmonology; 2019; 25(4):199. PubMed ID: 31255292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the quality of papers published in pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research. Drummond MF; Daniel Mullins C Value Health; 2013; 16(2):229-30. PubMed ID: 23538174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. No sex please, we're British (neurologists). Lancet Neurol; 2002 Nov; 1(7):395. PubMed ID: 12849345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of electronic publication and the E-journal on quality and the peer review process. Lee ST Ann Acad Med Singap; 1997 Jul; 26(4):393. PubMed ID: 9395796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Full disclosure of financial interests in biomedical publications--a reminder. Bailey BJ Laryngoscope; 2002 Feb; 112(2):211-2. PubMed ID: 11889370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]