BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12571300)

  • 1. Reduction of a dislocation of the hip due to developmental dysplasia. Implications for the need for future surgery.
    Luhmann SJ; Bassett GS; Gordon JE; Schootman M; Schoenecker PL
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Feb; 85(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 12571300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The prognostic importance of the ossific nucleus in the treatment of congenital dysplasia of the hip.
    Luhmann SJ; Schoenecker PL; Anderson AM; Bassett GS
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Dec; 80(12):1719-27. PubMed ID: 9875929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does Perfusion MRI After Closed Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Reduce the Incidence of Avascular Necrosis?
    Gornitzky AL; Georgiadis AG; Seeley MA; Horn BD; Sankar WN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1153-65. PubMed ID: 26092677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The surgical treatment of established congenital dislocation of the hip: results of surgery after planned delayed intervention following the appearance of the capital femoral ossific nucleus.
    Clarke NM; Jowett AJ; Parker L
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2005; 25(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 15958890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The presence of an ossific nucleus does not protect against osteonecrosis after treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip.
    Roposch A; Odeh O; Doria AS; Wedge JH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Oct; 469(10):2838-45. PubMed ID: 21312075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of the femoral head ossific nucleus in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A meta-analysis.
    Roposch A; Stöhr KK; Dobson M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Apr; 91(4):911-8. PubMed ID: 19339576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Late reduction in congenital dislocation of the hip and the need for secondary surgery: radiologic predictors and confounding variables.
    Bolland BJ; Wahed A; Al-Hallao S; Culliford DJ; Clarke NM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2010; 30(7):676-82. PubMed ID: 20864852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors for secondary procedures in walking DDH.
    Gholve PA; Flynn JM; Garner MR; Millis MB; Kim YJ
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2012; 32(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 22411335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is the absence of the ossific nucleus prognostic for avascular necrosis after closed reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip?
    Carney BT; Clark D; Minter CL
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2004; 13(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15055492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The role of the ossific nucleus in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip joint].
    Sibiński M; Grzegorzewski A; Drobniewski M; Synder M
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2009; 74(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 19514486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dysplasia of the contralateral hip in patients with unilateral late-detected congenital dislocation of the hip: 50 years' follow-up of 48 patients.
    Terjesen T
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Sep; 96-B(9):1161-6. PubMed ID: 25183584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How Does Bony Surgery Affect Results of Anterior Open Reduction in Walking-age Children With Developmental Hip Dysplasia?
    Kothari A; Grammatopoulos G; Hopewell S; Theologis T
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1199-208. PubMed ID: 26487045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome at forty-five years after open reduction and innominate osteotomy for late-presenting developmental dislocation of the hip. Surgical technique.
    Wedge JH; Thomas SR; Salter RB
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90 Suppl 2 Pt 2():238-53. PubMed ID: 18829937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Closed Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Early-term Results From a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort.
    Sankar WN; Gornitzky AL; Clarke NMP; Herrera-Soto JA; Kelley SP; Matheney T; Mulpuri K; Schaeffer EK; Upasani VV; Williams N; Price CT;
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2019 Mar; 39(3):111-118. PubMed ID: 30730414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The role of the ossific nucleus in the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip joint].
    Sibiński M; Grzegorzewski A; Drobniewski M; Synder M
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2009; 74(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19514472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-stage correction of neglected developmental dysplasia of the hip by open reduction and pemberton osteotomy.
    Shih KS; Wang JH; Wang TM; Huang SC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2001 Jun; 100(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 11480249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Presence of the Ossific Nucleus and Risk of Osteonecrosis in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort and Case-Control Studies.
    Chen C; Doyle S; Green D; Blanco J; Scher D; Sink E; Dodwell ER
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):760-767. PubMed ID: 28463920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ligamentum teres tenodesis in medial approach open reduction for developmental dislocation of the hip.
    Bache CE; Graham HK; Dickens DR; Donnan L; Johnson MB; Nattrass G; O'Sullivan M; Torode IP
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2008 Sep; 28(6):607-13. PubMed ID: 18724195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The effect of absent ossific nucleus of the femoral head on results of surgical treatment for developmental dislocation of the hip].
    Ruszkowski K; Pucher A; Strzyzewski W
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2005; 70(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 16875178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Congenital dislocation of the hip in the older child. The effectiveness of overhead traction.
    Daoud A; Saighi-Bououina A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jan; 78(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 8550677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.