These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12572313)

  • 1. [Statistics must be seen and scrutinized! Fundamental to the progress of medical science--yet neglected in medical journals].
    Taube A
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5176-9. PubMed ID: 12572313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts.
    Harris A; Reeder R; Hyun J
    J Psychol; 2011; 145(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21560804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals: caveat lector?
    Goodman SN; Altman DG; George SL
    J Gen Intern Med; 1998 Nov; 13(11):753-6. PubMed ID: 9824521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advertising in dermatology journals: journals' and journal editors' policies, practices, and attitudes.
    Bartus CL; Katz KA
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jul; 55(1):116-22. PubMed ID: 16781302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How often do leading biomedical journals use statistical experts to evaluate statistical methods? The results of a survey.
    Hardwicke TE; Goodman SN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239598. PubMed ID: 33002031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appointment of statistical editor and quality of statistics in a small medical journal.
    Lukić IK; Marusić M
    Croat Med J; 2001 Oct; 42(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 11593496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Narrative Review of Statistical Reporting Checklists, Mandatory Statistical Editing, and Rectifying Common Problems in the Reporting of Scientific Articles.
    Dexter F; Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 124(3):943-947. PubMed ID: 27676281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: a primer for novice and seasoned reviewers.
    Lovejoy TI; Revenson TA; France CR
    Ann Behav Med; 2011 Aug; 42(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21505912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethics, economics, and the publication policies of major medical journals.
    Schulman K; Sulmasy DP; Roney D
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 8015131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prepublication review of medical ethics research: cause for concern.
    Landy DC; Coverdale JH; McCullough LB; Sharp RR
    Acad Med; 2009 Apr; 84(4):495-7. PubMed ID: 19318788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
    Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: Comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness.
    Henly SJ; Bennett JA; Dougherty MC
    Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 20637932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical reviewing for medical journals.
    Altman DG
    Stat Med; 1998 Dec; 17(23):2661-74. PubMed ID: 9881413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommendations for describing statistical studies and results in general readership science and engineering journals.
    Gardenier JS
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Dec; 18(4):651-62. PubMed ID: 21327724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
    Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
    J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [How strict should editors be? Nothing is done for the sake of errors].
    Eklund J
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(51-52):4250. PubMed ID: 15658596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication Integrity, Accessibility, and Women Authors.
    Elwood TW
    J Allied Health; 2017; 46(2):63. PubMed ID: 28561861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?
    Erb HN
    Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):165-74. PubMed ID: 20951447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.