These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12572602)

  • 1. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Theoretical and Practical Considerations when using Retroelement Insertions to Estimate Species Trees in the Anomaly Zone.
    Molloy EK; Gatesy J; Springer MS
    Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):721-740. PubMed ID: 34677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.
    Nei M; Kumar S; Takahashi K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Oct; 95(21):12390-7. PubMed ID: 9770497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support.
    Buckley TR; Cunningham CW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):394-405. PubMed ID: 11919280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement of distance-based phylogenetic methods by a local maximum likelihood approach using triplets.
    Ranwez V; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Nov; 19(11):1952-63. PubMed ID: 12411604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can weighting improve bushy trees? Models of cytochrome b evolution and the molecular systematics of pipits and wagtails (Aves: Motacillidae).
    Voelker G; Edwards SV
    Syst Biol; 1998 Dec; 47(4):589-603. PubMed ID: 12066304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracies of ancestral amino acid sequences inferred by the parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Zhang J; Nei M
    J Mol Evol; 1997; 44 Suppl 1():S139-46. PubMed ID: 9071022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.
    Takahashi K; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 2000 Aug; 17(8):1251-8. PubMed ID: 10908645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis.
    Jin L; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1990 Jan; 7(1):82-102. PubMed ID: 2299983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.