These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12572642)

  • 21. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of composite restorations with Syntac Bond and Denthesive.
    Saunders WP; Muirhead JM
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):255-7. PubMed ID: 1299251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
    Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage in facial and lingual Class 5 composite restorations: a comparison.
    Barnes DM; McDonald NJ; Thompson VP; Blank LW; Shires PJ
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 9028232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems.
    Castelnuovo J; Tjan AH; Liu P
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):245-8. PubMed ID: 9545877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites.
    Neiva IF; de Andrada MA; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):282-9. PubMed ID: 9855849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of posterior resin composite placement technique on the resin-dentin interface formed in vivo.
    Lopes GC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S; Vieira LC
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Feb; 35(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 15000640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation.
    Moosavi H; Sadeghi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Mar; 9(3):32-9. PubMed ID: 18335117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin.
    Silveira de Araújo C; Incerti da Silva T; Ogliari FA; Meireles SS; Piva E; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17091137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of resin composite polymerization techniques on microleakage and microhardness.
    Amaral CM; de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Ambrosano GM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Oct; 33(9):685-9. PubMed ID: 12666894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A microleakage study of single-bottle adhesives applied to enamel and cementum and aged by both occlusal loading and thermocycling.
    Ben-Amar A; Pilo R; Shapinko E; Lewinstein I
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 15887502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.