These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12572649)

  • 1. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 12572649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sealing ability of occlusal resin composite restoration using four restorative procedures.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 19049529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
    Sarrett DC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The clinical significance and management of microleakage. Part two.
    Larson TD
    Northwest Dent; 2005; 84(2):15-9. PubMed ID: 15934228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2005 Apr; 18(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 15973822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration margins.
    Dennison JB; Sarrett DC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 Apr; 39(4):301-18. PubMed ID: 22066463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations to dentin in vivo and in vitro.
    Hahn P; Weyen G; Fischer P; Plogmann S; Hannig M
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 19146127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class II posterior composites--ways to reduce bond stress and microleakage by using low modulus materials.
    Moon PC
    Va Dent J; 1995; 72(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 9540749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Future directions in bonding resins to the dentine-pulp complex.
    Bouillaguet S; Wataha JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 15089947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system.
    Estafan D; Agosta C
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(6):506-9. PubMed ID: 15055646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of curing methods and materials on the marginal seal of class V composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Siebrecht C; Hugo B; Klaiber B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 12670072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of Class II posterior composite restorations with gingival margins placed entirely within dentin.
    Stockton LW; Tsang ST
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2007 Apr; 73(3):255. PubMed ID: 17439712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
    Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.