198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12572653)
1. Volume currents in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Weinstein D; Johnson C
Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12572653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of head tissue conductivity in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
Van Uitert R; Johnson C; Zhukov L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2129-37. PubMed ID: 15605860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An advanced boundary element method (BEM) implementation for the forward problem of electromagnetic source imaging.
Akalin-Acar Z; Gençer NG
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(21):5011-28. PubMed ID: 15584534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of quasi-static magnetic reciprocity to finite element models of the MEG lead-field.
Schimpf PH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Nov; 54(11):2082-8. PubMed ID: 18018704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Representation of bioelectric current sources using Whitney elements in the finite element method.
Tanzer IO; Järvenpää S; Nenonen J; Somersalo E
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3023-39. PubMed ID: 15972978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
Gençer NG; Acar CE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
Wen P
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MEG forward problem formulation using equivalent surface current densities.
von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Nehorai A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1210-7. PubMed ID: 16041984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Realistic human head model for EEG from both the geometry and conductivity aspects.
Wen P; Pope K
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12854618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the influence of volume currents and extended sources on neuromagnetic fields: a simulation study.
Haueisen J; Ramon C; Czapski P; Eiselt M
Ann Biomed Eng; 1995; 23(6):728-39. PubMed ID: 8572423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating scalp MEG from whole-head MEG measurements.
Wang Y; Oertel U
Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 10791684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG.
Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH
Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three-shell and simplified volume conductor models in magnetoencephalography.
Stenroos M; Hunold A; Haueisen J
Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():337-348. PubMed ID: 24434678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
