These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1257302)

  • 1. A thermoluminescence system for the intercomparison of absorbed dose and radiation quality of X-rays with a HVL of 0-1 to 3-0 mm Cu.
    Puite KJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1976 Mar; 21(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 1257302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of precision thermoluminescence dosimetry for intercomparison of absorbed dose.
    Rossiter MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1975 Sep; 20(3):735-46. PubMed ID: 1187775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absorbed dose measurements of a handheld 50 kVP X-ray source in water with thermoluminescence dosemeters.
    Soares C; Drupieski C; Wingert B; Pritchett G; Pagonis V; O'Brien M; Sliski A; Bilski P; Olko P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):78-82. PubMed ID: 16735571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postal intercomparison of absorbed dose for high energy x rays with thermoluminescence dosimeters.
    Bjärngard BE; Kase KR; Rudén BI; Biggs PJ; Boyer AL; Johansson KA
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 6775180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti.
    Hauri P; Schneider U
    Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields.
    Fartaria MJ; Reis C; Pereira J; Pereira MF; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Oliveira C; Holovey V; Pascoal A; Alves JG
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6384-99. PubMed ID: 27499104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
    Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality control of X-ray orthovoltage therapy units with a dual TL system.
    Zaránd P; Polgár I; Katona E
    Acta Biochim Biophys Hung; 1989; 24(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 2487013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verification of surface dose on patients undergoing low to medium energy X-ray therapy.
    Ferguson S; Ostwald P; Kron T; Denham J
    Med Dosim; 1995; 20(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 7576088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Materials for thermoluminescent dose detectors and photon radiation energy detectors intended for intercomparison procedures of radiation therapy units.
    Kalmykov LZ
    Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1715-9. PubMed ID: 7891631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy response of LiF:Mg, Ti dosemeters to ISO 4037 and typical diagnostic x-ray beams in Tanzania.
    Muhogora WE; Ngoye WN; Lema US; Mwalongo D
    J Radiol Prot; 2002 Jun; 22(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 12148792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncertainty analysis of absorbed dose calculations from thermoluminescence dosimeters.
    Kirby TH; Hanson WF; Johnston DA
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(6):1427-33. PubMed ID: 1461205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. X-ray surface dose measurements using TLD extrapolation.
    Kron T; Elliot A; Wong T; Showell G; Clubb B; Metcalfe P
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):703-11. PubMed ID: 8350822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
    Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
    Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental determination of the photon-energy dependent dose-to-water response of TLD600 and TLD700 (LiF:Mg,Ti) thermoluminescence detectors.
    Schwahofer A; Feist H; Georg H; Häring P; Schlegel W
    Z Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 26972816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response.
    Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dosimetric intercomparison at the Scandinavian radiation therapy centres. I. Absorbed dose intercomparison.
    Johansson KA; Mattsson LO; Svensson H
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1982; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6283791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).
    Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE;
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.