These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12573367)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging in cardiology. Rademakers FE Lancet; 2003 Feb; 361(9355):359-60. PubMed ID: 12573367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How do interventional cardiologists make decisions?: implications for practice and reimbursement. Klein LW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 6(9):989-91. PubMed ID: 24050872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The mandate for quality: an invitation to be part of the solution. Bass TA; Harold JG Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):501-2. PubMed ID: 23918678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Myocardial infarct quantification: is magnetic resonance imaging ready to serve as a gold standard for electrocardiography? Engblom H; Arheden H; Foster JE; Martin TN J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 17478177 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of provider-led, technology-enabled radiology management program on imaging. Ip IK; Schneider L; Seltzer S; Smith A; Dudley J; Menard A; Khorasani R Am J Med; 2013 Aug; 126(8):687-92. PubMed ID: 23786668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Detection of liver metastases using contrast enhanced sonography]. Tranquart F J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 82(7):819. PubMed ID: 11507444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The costly quest for certainty. Handler S Minn Med; 2000 Jan; 83(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 10680423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. STEMI guidelines: from formulation to implementation. Di Mario C; Syrseloudis D; James S; Viceconte N; Wijns W EuroIntervention; 2012 Aug; 8 Suppl P():P11-7. PubMed ID: 22917781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Wagner A; Mahrholdt H; Holly TA; Elliott MD; Regenfus M; Parker M; Klocke FJ; Bonow RO; Kim RJ; Judd RM Lancet; 2003 Feb; 361(9355):374-9. PubMed ID: 12573373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Considerations: when more is not necessarily better. Borghese O; Sapienza P; Venturini L; Bononi M; di Marzo L Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2014; 48(5-6):365-6. PubMed ID: 24951294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. OMERACT 5 Economics Working Group: summary, recommendations, and research agenda. Gabriel S; Drummond M; Suarez-Almazor ME; Ruff B; Guillemin F; Bombardier C; Boers M; Maetzel A; Ruof J; Cranney A; Marentette M; Tugwell P J Rheumatol; 2001 Mar; 28(3):670-3. PubMed ID: 11296980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Challenges and strategies in the provision of high-quality nuclear cardiology imaging services in office-based cardiology practice. Bateman TM; Thomas GS J Nucl Cardiol; 2004; 11(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 15173771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Help in the middle. Palazzolo JD; Riner RN J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 13(7):558-61. PubMed ID: 11435646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Should the ordering of medical imaging examinations be reexamined? Margulis AR; Bhargavan M; Feldman D; Sunshine JH J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Oct; 2(10):809-11. PubMed ID: 17411937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Are cardiologists truly better at appropriately selecting patients for stress myocardial perfusion imaging? Doukky R; Hayes K; Frogge N Int J Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 176(1):285-6. PubMed ID: 25042647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Give me back managed care.' Part 1. Irvin JD Manag Care; 1995 Dec; 4(12):31-2, 34. PubMed ID: 10153808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]