616 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12573373)
1. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study.
Wagner A; Mahrholdt H; Holly TA; Elliott MD; Regenfus M; Parker M; Klocke FJ; Bonow RO; Kim RJ; Judd RM
Lancet; 2003 Feb; 361(9355):374-9. PubMed ID: 12573373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of myocardial necrosis early after acute myocardial infarction.
Ibrahim T; Bülow HP; Hackl T; Hörnke M; Nekolla SG; Breuer M; Schömig A; Schwaiger M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 49(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 17222732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography with gated single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of significant coronary artery disease: a large European multicenter study.
Senior R; Moreo A; Gaibazzi N; Agati L; Tiemann K; Shivalkar B; von Bardeleben S; Galiuto L; Lardoux H; Trocino G; Carrió I; Le Guludec D; Sambuceti G; Becher H; Colonna P; Ten Cate F; Bramucci E; Cohen A; Bezante G; Aggeli C; Kasprzak JD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 62(15):1353-61. PubMed ID: 23770168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of reversible myocardial dysfunction in chronic ischaemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance and a combined positron emission tomography-single photon emission computed tomography imaging protocol.
Kühl HP; Lipke CS; Krombach GA; Katoh M; Battenberg TF; Nowak B; Heussen N; Buecker A; Schaefer WM
Eur Heart J; 2006 Apr; 27(7):846-53. PubMed ID: 16434414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging--comparison of the late enhancement technique with positronemission tomography].
Hunold P; Brandt-Mainz K; Freudenberg L; Vogt FM; Neumann T; Knipp S; Barkhausen J
Rofo; 2002 Jul; 174(7):867-73. PubMed ID: 12101477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acute myocardial infarction: myocardial viability assessment in patients early thereafter comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging with resting (201)Tl SPECT. Single photon emission computed tomography.
Kitagawa K; Sakuma H; Hirano T; Okamoto S; Makino K; Takeda K
Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 12511682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic detection and size quantification of infarcts by myocardial perfusion SPECT: clinical validation by delayed-enhancement MRI.
Slomka PJ; Fieno D; Thomson L; Friedman JD; Hayes SW; Germano G; Berman DS
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 15872343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of scar thickness on the assessment of viability using dobutamine echocardiography and thallium single-photon emission computed tomography: a comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Nelson C; McCrohon J; Khafagi F; Rose S; Leano R; Marwick TH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Apr; 43(7):1248-56. PubMed ID: 15063438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between myocardial contrast echocardiography and single-photon emission computed tomography for predicting transmurality of acute myocardial infarction.
Hayat SA; Janardhanan R; Moon JC; Pennell DJ; Senior R
Am J Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 97(12):1718-21. PubMed ID: 16765120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Left ventricular wall motion abnormalities as well as reduced wall thickness can cause false positive results of routine SPECT perfusion imaging for detection of myocardial infarction.
Mahrholdt H; Zhydkov A; Hager S; Meinhardt G; Vogelsberg H; Wagner A; Sechtem U
Eur Heart J; 2005 Oct; 26(20):2127-35. PubMed ID: 16006444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Myocardial viability by contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison with gated single-photon emission tomography and FDG position emission tomography.
Wu YW; Tadamura E; Kanao S; Yamamuro M; Marui A; Komeda M; Toma M; Kimura T; Togashi K
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2007 Dec; 23(6):757-65. PubMed ID: 17364219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute myocardial infarct detection with dual energy CT: correlation with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial scintigraphy in a canine model.
Peng J; Zhang LJ; Schoepf UJ; Gibbs KP; Ji HS; Yang GF; Zhu H; Lu GM
Acta Radiol; 2013 Apr; 54(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 23543148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to cardiac scintigraphy to identify nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Yokokawa M; Tada H; Toyama T; Koyama K; Naito S; Oshima S; Taniguchi K
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S57-62. PubMed ID: 19250113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between myocardial contrast echocardiography and (99m)technetium sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography determined myocardial viability in predicting hard cardiac events following acute myocardial infarction.
Dwivedi G; Janardhanan R; Hayat SA; Lim TK; Senior R
Am J Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1184-8. PubMed ID: 19840559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging.
Lund GK; Stork A; Saeed M; Bansmann MP; Gerken JH; Müller V; Mester J; Higgins CB; Adam G; Meinertz T
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 15166320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic impact of contrast-enhanced CMR early after acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a regional STEMI network: results of the "Herzinfarktverbund Essen".
Bruder O; Breuckmann F; Jensen C; Jochims M; Naber CK; Barkhausen J; Erbel R; Sabin GV;
Herz; 2008 Mar; 33(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 18344033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of late gadolinium enhancement in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in comparison with single-photon emission tomography using Tc99m-Sestamibi.
Hadamitzky M; Langhans B; Hausleiter J; Sonne C; Byrne RA; Mehilli J; Kastrati A; Schömig A; Martinoff S; Ibrahim T
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Feb; 15(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 24243144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.
Schwitter J; Wacker CM; Wilke N; Al-Saadi N; Sauer E; Huettle K; Schönberg SO; Luchner A; Strohm O; Ahlstrom H; Dill T; Hoebel N; Simor T;
Eur Heart J; 2013 Mar; 34(10):775-81. PubMed ID: 22390914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The assessment of area at risk and myocardial salvage after coronary revascularization in acute myocardial infarction: comparison between CMR and SPECT.
Hadamitzky M; Langhans B; Hausleiter J; Sonne C; Kastrati A; Martinoff S; Schömig A; Ibrahim T
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 6(3):358-69. PubMed ID: 23473113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction: MR imaging vs. MDCT vs. SPECT.
Mahnken AH; Bruners P; Stanzel S; Koos R; Mühlenbruch G; Günther RW; Reinartz P
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):480-5. PubMed ID: 18650043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
