These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12574924)

  • 1. Comparison of conventional and gaze-down imaging in laparoscopic task performance.
    Brown SI; Frank TG; El Shallaly G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):586-90. PubMed ID: 12574924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing.
    Emam TA; Hanna G; Cuschieri A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Feb; 16(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 11967676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of face-mounted binocular video display for laparoscopy: outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction.
    Minnich DJ; Schell SR
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2003 Oct; 13(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14617395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Video-assisted surgery represents more than a loss of three-dimensional vision.
    Gallagher AG; Ritter EM; Lederman AB; McClusky DA; Smith CD
    Am J Surg; 2005 Jan; 189(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 15701497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Construct validity of an objective assessment method for laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing and knot tying.
    Van Sickle KR; Baghai M; Huang IP; Goldenberg A; Smith CD; Ritter EM
    Am J Surg; 2008 Jul; 196(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 18417086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a head-mounted display (HMD) in the performance of a simulated laparoscopic task.
    Cheah WK; Lenzi JE; So J; Dong F; Kum CK; Goh P
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Sep; 15(9):990-1. PubMed ID: 11443461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative evaluation of three advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies: a stereo endoscope, an image projection display, and a TFT display.
    Wentink M; Jakimowicz JJ; Vos LM; Meijer DW; Wieringa PA
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Aug; 16(8):1237-41. PubMed ID: 11984691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy.
    Erfanian K; Luks FI; Kurkchubasche AG; Wesselhoeft CW; Tracy TF
    J Pediatr Surg; 2003 Jul; 38(7):1059-62. PubMed ID: 12861539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple device for measuring the resolution of videoscopic cameras and laparoscopes in the operating room.
    Berber E; Pearl JM; Siperstein AE
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Jul; 16(7):1111-3; discussion 1114. PubMed ID: 12165837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic surgery and resident training.
    De Ugarte DA; Etzioni DA; Gracia C; Atkinson JB
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 12658424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gaze patterns in laparoscopic surgery.
    Ibbotson JA; MacKenzie CL; Cao CG; Lomax AJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():154-60. PubMed ID: 10538347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
    Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
    Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image-navigated endoscopic surgery: introduction of the face-mounted display system with picture-in-picture capabilities.
    Yoshida T; Inoue H; Kumagai Y; Iwai T
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2000; 47(32):375-7. PubMed ID: 10791193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study.
    Wagner AA; Varkarakis IM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Su LM
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16844449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations.
    Korndorffer JR; Clayton JL; Tesfay ST; Brunner WC; Sierra R; Dunne JB; Jones DB; Rege RV; Touchard CL; Scott DJ
    J Surg Res; 2005 Sep; 128(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 15916767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging for endoscopic surgery: new developments applicable to pediatric surgical interventions.
    Schier F; Beyerlein S; Gauderer MW
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2002 Sep; 18(5-6):459-62. PubMed ID: 12415381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
    Dakin GF; Gagner M
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic skills training using a webcam trainer.
    Chung SY; Landsittel D; Chon CH; Ng CS; Fuchs GJ
    J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):180-3. PubMed ID: 15592070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task.
    Moorthy K; Munz Y; Undre S; Darzi A
    Surgery; 2004 Jul; 136(1):25-30; discussion 31. PubMed ID: 15232535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Video self-assessment augments development of videoscopic suturing skill.
    Jamshidi R; LaMasters T; Eisenberg D; Duh QY; Curet M
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):622-5. PubMed ID: 19854403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.