BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12575483)

  • 1. Recording EEG and EP data.
    Jobert M
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2002; 24 Suppl C():7-16. PubMed ID: 12575483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance metrics for the accurate characterisation of interictal spike detection algorithms.
    Casson AJ; Luna E; Rodriguez-Villegas E
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Mar; 177(2):479-87. PubMed ID: 19007811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geometric subspace methods and time-delay embedding for EEG artifact removal and classification.
    Anderson CW; Knight JN; O'Connor T; Kirby MJ; Sokolov A
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Jun; 14(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 16792280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Recommendations of the Deutsche EEG-Gesellschaft for the mapping of EEG parameters (EEG and EP mapping)].
    Herrmann WM; Kubicki S; Künkel H; Kugler J; Lehmann D; Maurer K; Rappelsberger P; Scheuler W
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1989 Sep; 20(3):125-32. PubMed ID: 2491024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive neuroscience of creativity: EEG based approaches.
    Srinivasan N
    Methods; 2007 May; 42(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 17434421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of EEG modifications due to motor imagery for brain-computer interfaces.
    Cincotti F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Salinari S; Bianchi L; Marciani MG; Babiloni F
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Jun; 11(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 12899254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of linear, nonlinear, and feature selection methods for EEG signal classification.
    Garrett D; Peterson DA; Anderson CW; Thaut MH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Jun; 11(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 12899257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The disposing techniques of evoked potentials].
    Liu HG; Zhou L; Gu J; Jing DZ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2000 Nov; 24(6):314-7, 320. PubMed ID: 12583248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for classification of EEG signals using wavelet coefficients.
    Güler I; Ubeyli ED
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Oct; 148(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 16054702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for the recording and evaluation of pharmaco-EEG data in man: the International Pharmaco-EEG Society (IPEG).
    Jobert M; Wilson FJ; Ruigt GS; Brunovsky M; Prichep LS; Drinkenburg WH;
    Neuropsychobiology; 2012; 66(4):201-20. PubMed ID: 23075830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study.
    Bonato C; Miniussi C; Rossini PM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1699-707. PubMed ID: 16797232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recording event-related activity under hostile magnetic resonance environment: Is multimodal EEG/ERP-MRI recording possible?
    Karakaş HM; Karakaş S; Ozkan Ceylan A; Tali ET
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Aug; 73(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 19414046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Higher order statistics-based radial basis function network for evoked potentials.
    Lin BS; Lin BS; Chong FC; Lai F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Jan; 56(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 19224723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous recording of laser-evoked brain potentials and continuous, high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging in humans.
    Iannetti GD; Niazy RK; Wise RG; Jezzard P; Brooks JC; Zambreanu L; Vennart W; Matthews PM; Tracey I
    Neuroimage; 2005 Nov; 28(3):708-19. PubMed ID: 16112589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New head exposure system for use in human provocation studies with EEG recording during GSM900- and UMTS-like exposure.
    Schmid G; Cecil S; Goger C; Trimmel M; Kuster N; Molla-Djafari H
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Dec; 28(8):636-47. PubMed ID: 17654486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new device and protocol for combining TMS and online recordings of EEG and evoked potentials.
    Thut G; Ives JR; Kampmann F; Pastor MA; Pascual-Leone A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Feb; 141(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 15661302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Massively parallel classification of single-trial EEG signals using a min-max modular neural network.
    Lu BL; Shin J; Ichikawa M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Mar; 51(3):551-8. PubMed ID: 15000389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive regularization network based neural modeling paradigm for nonlinear adaptive estimation of cerebral evoked potentials.
    Zhang JH; Böhme JF
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):1008-18. PubMed ID: 17123858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slow potentials are important in neonatal EEG.
    Puumala P; Sonkajärvi E; Karvonen E; Tuukkanen J; Jäntti VH
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 117(4):928-9; author reply 929-30. PubMed ID: 16495150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatio-spectral filters for improving the classification of single trial EEG.
    Lemm S; Blankertz B; Curio G; Müller KR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Sep; 52(9):1541-8. PubMed ID: 16189967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.