These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12575973)

  • 1. Stenosis is in the eye of the observer: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aortic valve area.
    Levine RA; Schwammenthal E
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Feb; 41(3):443-5. PubMed ID: 12575973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity.
    Garcia D; Dumesnil JG; Durand LG; Kadem L; Pibarot P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Feb; 41(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 12575972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the catheter-Doppler pressure gradient discrepancy in aortic stenosis.
    Pai RG; Pai AD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May; 20(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 21714420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Whom do you trust? Misguided faith in the catheter- or Doppler-derived aortic valve gradient.
    Turi ZG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Jun; 65(2):180-2. PubMed ID: 15812810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overestimation of aortic valve gradient measured by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Sakthi C; Yee H; Kotlewski A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Jun; 65(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 15812813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic characterization of aortic stenosis states.
    Abbas AE; Pibarot P
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 93(5):1002-1023. PubMed ID: 30790429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determining that aortic valve stenosis is severe: back-to-the-future: physical examination and aortic valve area index/energy loss index < or =0.6 cm2/m2.
    Rahimtoola SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jun; 3(6):563-6. PubMed ID: 20541710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing a Continuous Quality Improvement Program in a High-Volume Clinical Echocardiography Laboratory: Improving Care for Patients With Aortic Stenosis.
    Samad Z; Minter S; Armour A; Tinnemore A; Sivak JA; Sedberry B; Strub K; Horan SM; Harrison JK; Kisslo J; Douglas PS; Velazquez EJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 26957220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodologic issues in clinical evaluation of stenosis severity in adults undergoing aortic or mitral balloon valvuloplasty. The NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry.
    Otto CM; Davis KB; Holmes DR; O'Neill W; Ferguson J; Bashore TM; Bonan R
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 69(19):1607-16. PubMed ID: 1598878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A granular approach to improve reproducibility of the echocardiographic assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after TAVI.
    Abdelghani M; Ren B; Spitzer E; Tateishi H; Jonker H; Geleijnse ML; Tijssen JG; de Winter RJ; Serruys PW; Soliman OI
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1519-27. PubMed ID: 27464964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraprocedural TAVR Annulus Sizing Using 3D TEE and the "Turnaround Rule".
    Wiley BM; Kovacic JC; Basnet S; Makoto A; Chaudhry FA; Kini AS; Sharma SK; Sengupta PP
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Feb; 9(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 26093927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical implication of energy loss coefficient in patients with severe aortic stenosis diagnosed by Doppler echocardiography.
    Kume T; Okura H; Kawamoto T; Watanabe N; Hayashida A; Neishi Y; Miyamoto Y; Imai K; Yamada R; Yoshida K
    Circ J; 2008 Aug; 72(8):1265-9. PubMed ID: 18654011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exercise echocardiography in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.
    Vamvakidou A; Karogiannis N; Ramzy I; Elghamaz A; Senior R
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1561-2. PubMed ID: 26271199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Doppler evaluation of aortic valve area in children with aortic stenosis.
    Bengur AR; Snider AR; Meliones JN; Vermilion RP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Nov; 18(6):1499-505. PubMed ID: 1939952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet.
    VanAuker MD; Hla A; Meisner JS; Strom JA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 10772051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Doppler derived aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: its hemodynamic validation.
    Ho PP; Pauls GL; Lamberton DF; Portnoff JS; Pai RG; Shah PM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 May; 3(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 8087265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of jet eccentricity in generating disproportionately elevated transaortic pressure gradients in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Abbas AE; Franey LM; Lester S; Raff G; Gallagher MJ; Hanzel G; Safian RD; Pibarot P
    Echocardiography; 2015 Feb; 32(2):372-82. PubMed ID: 25138664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of serial stenoses.
    Scantlebury DC; Geske JB; Nishimura RA
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):850-2. PubMed ID: 24046382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comment on: overestimation of aortic valve gradient measured by Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;65:176-9.
    Laskey WK; Osborne L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Dec; 66(4):598. PubMed ID: 16208715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Functional Significance of Paradoxical Low-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis: Hemodynamic Findings During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.
    Pérez Del Villar C; Yotti R; Espinosa MÁ; Gutiérrez-Ibañes E; Barrio A; Lorenzo MJ; Sánchez Fernández PL; Benito Y; Prieto R; Pérez David E; Martínez-Legazpi P; Fernández-Avilés F; Bermejo J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jan; 10(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 27568118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.