157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12576399)
1. Lung cancer screening debate.
Blum J; Rinne N
Chest; 2003 Feb; 123(2):653; author reply 654-5. PubMed ID: 12576399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Whether and under what conditions FDG-PET might be cost-effective in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules depicted on lung cancer screening in Japan].
Tsushima Y; Aoki J; Endo K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 63(8):390-8. PubMed ID: 14587408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lung cancer screening debate.
Gould MK
Chest; 2003 Feb; 123(2):653-4; author reply 654-5. PubMed ID: 12593410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CT screening for lung cancer.
Dehavenon A
N Engl J Med; 2007 Feb; 356(7):745-6; author reply 746-7. PubMed ID: 17310515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CT screening for lung cancer: is smaller better?
Heffner JE; Silvestri G
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2002 Feb; 165(4):433-4. PubMed ID: 11850330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. PET scans for lung nodules: costs and cost-effectiveness.
Arenberg D
Chest; 2010 Jan; 137(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 20051397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Segmental
Spadafora M; Pace L; Mansi L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 27695909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronary computed tomographic angiography and incidental pulmonary nodules.
Bluemke DA
Circulation; 2014 Aug; 130(8):634-7. PubMed ID: 25015341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lung cancer screening trial financed by tobacco-funded foundation, sparks debate.
Twombly R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):690-1. PubMed ID: 18477793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How to scan who: the delicate balance between selecting the patient and selecting the imaging protocol.
Hustinx R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jan; 44(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 27624189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer.
Wilck EJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Feb; 85(2):S699-700. PubMed ID: 18222199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Lung cancer screening: who will pick up the tab?
Grannis FW
Chest; 2002 May; 121(5):1388-90. PubMed ID: 12006414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Screening for lung cancer using low dosage computer tomography].
Lähde S
Duodecim; 2004; 120(6):647-8. PubMed ID: 15119225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Difficulty of early diagnosis in patients with solitary pulmonary nodule.
Sortini D; Maravegias K; Sortini A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 May; 129(5):1196; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 15867812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Early Lung Cancer Action Project.
Drury NE; Brown I; Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Delany DJ; Halson P
Lancet; 1999 Oct; 354(9185):1206. PubMed ID: 10513731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HCFA's coverage instructions for lung PET. Health Care Financing Administration.
Smith WJ
J Nucl Med; 1998 Jul; 39(7):28N-30N. PubMed ID: 9669378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The cost benefits of early detection.
Guntheroth WG
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5889):639. PubMed ID: 18669840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: A High-Value Proposition?
Roth JA; Ramsey SD
JAMA; 2016 Jan; 315(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 26746460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Large field trial for lung cancer screening: putting the wrong cart before the horse?
Black WC; Aberle DR; Berg CD
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):314-6; discussion 317-8. PubMed ID: 17456862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Black WC
J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Mar; 30(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 25635704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
