BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12577072)

  • 21. Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: are systematic narrative reviews indicated?
    Colliver JA; Kucera K; Verhulst SJ
    Med Educ; 2008 Sep; 42(9):858-65. PubMed ID: 18715482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Abbate A; Sheiban I
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Aug; 5(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 19736151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.
    Finckh A; Tramèr MR
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Mar; 4(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 18227829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization.
    Sim J; Reid N
    Phys Ther; 1999 Feb; 79(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 10029058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of yield in a non-systematic and a systematic review.
    Downer MC; Moles DR; Speight PM
    Community Dent Health; 2004 Jun; 21(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15228202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology.
    Evans D; Kowanko I
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11878498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The practice of systematic reviews. V. Heterogeneity between studies and subgroup analysis].
    Scholten RJ; Assendelft WJ; Kostense PJ; Bouter LM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Apr; 143(16):843-8. PubMed ID: 10347653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials].
    Labenz J; Kunz CU
    Anaesthesist; 2011 Jan; 60(1):79-89; quiz 90. PubMed ID: 21264653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency.
    Honig PK
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Aug; 88(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 20648031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Meta-analysis: the art of the systematic overview].
    Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ; Boers M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Aug; 137(32):1594-9. PubMed ID: 8366959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Critical appraisal of review articles.
    Hutchison BG
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 May; 39():1097-102. PubMed ID: 8499790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Building the powerful 10-minute office visit: Part II. Beginning a critical literature review.
    Neely JG; Hartman JM; Wallace MS
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 11192902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pacifier use and early childhood caries: an evidence-based study of the literature.
    Peressini S
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12556264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Problems with meta-analysis.
    Herbison P
    N Z Med J; 1999 Feb; 112(1081):38-41. PubMed ID: 10078215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistically significant meta-analyses of clinical trials have modest credibility and inflated effects.
    Pereira TV; Ioannidis JP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):1060-9. PubMed ID: 21454050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Practical and updated guidelines on performing meta-analyses of non-randomized studies in interventional cardiology.
    Navarese EP; Koziński M; Pafundi T; Andreotti F; Buffon A; Servi SD; Kubica J
    Cardiol J; 2011; 18(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21305479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.