These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12577912)

  • 21. Introducing the community guide's reviews of evidence on interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers.
    Breslow RA; Rimer BK; Baron RC; Coates RJ; Kerner J; Wilson KM; Lee NC; Mullen PD; Coughlin SS; Briss PA
    Am J Prev Med; 2008 Jul; 35(1 Suppl):S14-20. PubMed ID: 18541183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
    Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost-effectiveness of mammography for older women.
    Finucane TE
    Ann Intern Med; 2004 May; 140(10):844; author reply 844. PubMed ID: 15148077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
    Gail MH; Schairer C
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):540; author reply 543-4. PubMed ID: 20157102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct and indirect randomized trials of screening: the A's and D's of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.
    Mahon J
    CMAJ; 2000 Apr; 162(7):1002-4. PubMed ID: 10763399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Breast cancer in 2007: incidence, risk assessment, and risk reduction strategies.
    Lester J
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2007 Oct; 11(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 17962169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Screening--prevention or overtreatment. Interview by Hanne Ried Larsen].
    Lunde IM
    Sygeplejersken; 1994 Jun; 94(23):4-7. PubMed ID: 7801250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.
    Mahnken JD; Chan W; Freeman DH; Freeman JL
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 18445697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The background review for the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
    Dickersin K; Tovey D; Wilcken N; Ghersi D
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):537; author reply 538-9. PubMed ID: 20157109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
    Moss S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
    Seewaldt VL
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):541-2; author reply 543-4. PubMed ID: 20157105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The background review for the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
    Jørgensen KJ; Gøtzsche PC
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):538; author reply 538-9. PubMed ID: 20157097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
    Dean PB
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):539; author reply 543-4. PubMed ID: 20157108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Give us clear, not convoluted, clinical practice guidelines.
    Lawrence MR
    CMAJ; 2001 Nov; 165(11):1468; author reply 1469. PubMed ID: 11762569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comments and response on the USPSTF recommendation on screening for breast cancer.
    Col NF; Hansen MH; Fischhoff B; Pauker SG
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):542; author reply 543-4. PubMed ID: 20157100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Primary prevention and screening in adults: update 2006].
    Cornuz J; Guessous I; Rodondi N
    Rev Med Suisse; 2006 Jan; 2(50):262-73. PubMed ID: 16503042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The controversy of mammography screening.
    Kopans DB
    Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are there downsides to mammography screening?
    Baines CJ
    Breast J; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():S7-10. PubMed ID: 15725116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
    Lee CH; Weinreb JC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence.
    Walter LC; Lewis CL; Barton MB
    Am J Med; 2005 Oct; 118(10):1078-86. PubMed ID: 16194635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.