These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12578074)

  • 1. Warning devices for prevention of dental injury during laryngoscopy. Preliminary report.
    Ho AM; Hewitt G
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2000; 16(4):269-72. PubMed ID: 12578074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Determination of the distance between the upper incisors and the laryngoscope blade during laryngoscopy: comparisons of the McCoy, the Macintosh, the Miller, and the Belscope blades].
    Bito H; Nishiyama T; Higarhizawa T; Sakai T; Konishi A
    Masui; 1998 Oct; 47(10):1257-61. PubMed ID: 9834604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Callender modification of the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces the risk of tooth-blade contact in children.
    Mireskandari SM; Askarizadeh N; Darabi ME; Rahimi E; Ataee HA; Chamrami F; Eghtesadi-Araghi P
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Nov; 18(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 18950325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental trauma associated with anaesthesia.
    Owen H; Waddell-Smith I
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2000 Apr; 28(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 10788963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Callander laryngoscope blade modification is associated with a decreased risk of dental contact.
    Lee J; Choi JH; Lee YK; Kim ES; Kwon OK; Hastings RH
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 51(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 14766698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of the distance between the laryngoscope blade and the upper incisors during direct laryngoscopy: comparisons of a curved, an angulated straight, and two straight blades.
    Watanabe S; Suga A; Asakura N; Takeshima R; Kimura T; Taguchi N; Kumagai M
    Anesth Analg; 1994 Oct; 79(4):638-41. PubMed ID: 7943768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect videolaryngoscopy using Macintosh blades in patients with non-anticipated difficult airways results in significantly lower forces exerted on teeth relative to classic direct laryngoscopy: a randomized crossover trial.
    Pieters B; Maassen R; Van Eig E; Maathuis B; Van Den Dobbelsteen J; Van Zundert A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Aug; 81(8):846-54. PubMed ID: 25311949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pressure on the incisors during direct laryngoscopy and intubation using the Shikani Optical Stylet™.
    Kucaba G; Muster M; Filip D; Horeczy B; Szarpak L; Woloszczuk-Gebicka B
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1370-1372. PubMed ID: 28318802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomised comparative study of the effect of Airtraq optical laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope on intraocular pressure in non-ophthalmic surgery.
    Das B; Samal RK; Ghosh A; Kundu R
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 26768925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted head extension minimizes the frequency of dental contact with laryngoscopic blade during tracheal intubation.
    Kim HJ; Lee JM; Bahk JH
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1629-33. PubMed ID: 24041638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental protection with a padded laryngoscope flange.
    Pysyk CL
    Can J Anaesth; 2016 May; 63(5):641-2. PubMed ID: 26690631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Universal dental protection device!
    Kumar GV; Dutta A; Sood J
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Sep; 50(8):1037-8. PubMed ID: 16923103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes in novice users: a manikin study.
    Ray DC; Billington C; Kearns PK; Kirkbride R; Mackintosh K; Reeve CS; Robinson N; Stewart CJ; Trudeau T
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Nov; 64(11):1207-10. PubMed ID: 19825056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prevention of dental damage and improvement of difficult intubation using a paraglossal technique with a straight Miller blade.
    Huang YF; Ting CK; Chang WK; Chan KH; Chen PT
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2010 Oct; 73(10):553-6. PubMed ID: 21051035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical strain to maxillary incisors during direct laryngoscopy.
    Engoren M; Rochlen LR; Diehl MV; Sherman SS; Jewell E; Golinski M; Begeman P; Cavanaugh JM
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):151. PubMed ID: 29115945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
    Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Easy and safe dental protection in rigid endoscopy.
    Quante G; Knoedgen R; Eckel HE; Klussmann JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Feb; 132(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 15692535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Videolaryngoscopy could decrease claims associated with dental injury.
    Lee JM
    J Clin Anesth; 2018 Jun; 47():64. PubMed ID: 29587207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors by video laryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Lee RA; van Zundert AA; Maassen RL; Wieringa PA
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22091734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effective dental protection during rigid endoscopy.
    Domanski M; Lee P; Sadeghi N
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Dec; 121(12):2590-1. PubMed ID: 22109757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.