These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12578806)

  • 1. Effects of exposure measurement error when an exposure variable is constrained by a lower limit.
    Richardson DB; Ciampi A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 157(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12578806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Varied forms of bias due to nondifferential error in measuring exposure.
    Brenner H; Loomis D
    Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 7986865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consequences of exposure measurement error for confounder identification in environmental epidemiology.
    Budtz-Jørgensen E; Keiding N; Grandjean P; Weihe P; White RF
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3089-100. PubMed ID: 12973789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When measurement errors correlate with truth: surprising effects of nondifferential misclassification.
    Wacholder S
    Epidemiology; 1995 Mar; 6(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 7742402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplification of Bias Due to Exposure Measurement Error.
    Richardson DB; Keil AP; Cole SR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 191(1):182-187. PubMed ID: 34455433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The detection of gene-environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement?
    Wong MY; Day NE; Luan JA; Chan KP; Wareham NJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 32(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 12690008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement error in epidemiologic studies of air pollution based on land-use regression models.
    Basagaña X; Aguilera I; Rivera M; Agis D; Foraster M; Marrugat J; Elosua R; Künzli N
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 178(8):1342-6. PubMed ID: 24105967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurement error in environmental epidemiology and the shape of exposure-response curves.
    Rhomberg LR; Chandalia JK; Long CM; Goodman JE
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 41(8):651-71. PubMed ID: 21823979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.
    Spiegelman D; Casella M
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
    Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of incomplete exposure assessment on epidemiologic dose-response analyses.
    Loomis DP; Savitz DA
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1994 Jun; 20(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 7973492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exposure measurement error in time-series studies of air pollution: concepts and consequences.
    Zeger SL; Thomas D; Dominici F; Samet JM; Schwartz J; Dockery D; Cohen A
    Environ Health Perspect; 2000 May; 108(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 10811568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Instrumental variables vs. grouping approach for reducing bias due to measurement error.
    Batistatou E; McNamee R
    Int J Biostat; 2008; 4(1):Article 8. PubMed ID: 22462115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mismeasurement and the resonance of strong confounders: uncorrelated errors.
    Marshall JR; Hastrup JL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1996 May; 143(10):1069-78. PubMed ID: 8629614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias in the estimation of exposure effects with individual- or group-based exposure assessment.
    Kim HM; Richardson D; Loomis D; Van Tongeren M; Burstyn I
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2011; 21(2):212-21. PubMed ID: 20179749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regression calibration for classical exposure measurement error in environmental epidemiology studies using multiple local surrogate exposures.
    Bateson TF; Wright JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 172(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 20573838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of measurement errors on relative risk regressions.
    Armstrong BG
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Dec; 132(6):1176-84. PubMed ID: 2260550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing Bias Due to Exposure Measurement Error Using Disease Risk Scores.
    Richardson DB; Keil AP; Cole SR; Edwards JK
    Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Apr; 190(4):621-629. PubMed ID: 32997142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.