164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12578902)
1. Artificial neural network analysis for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in the Japanese population.
Matsui Y; Egawa S; Tsukayama C; Terai A; Kuwao S; Baba S; Arai Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 Dec; 32(12):530-5. PubMed ID: 12578902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer stage.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; De Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1306-10. PubMed ID: 15371829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Eur Urol; 2004 Nov; 46(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 15474265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of pathological stage based on clinical stage, serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy Gleason score: Partin Tables in the contemporary era.
Tosoian JJ; Chappidi M; Feng Z; Humphreys EB; Han M; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Trock BJ
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 27367645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel staging tool for localized prostate cancer: a pilot study using genetic adaptive neural networks.
Tewari A; Narayan P
J Urol; 1998 Aug; 160(2):430-6. PubMed ID: 9679892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of neural networks and logistic regression analysis for predicting pathological stage in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population based study.
Borque A; Sanz G; Allepuz C; Plaza L; Gil P; Rioja LA
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1672-8. PubMed ID: 11586200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma.
Han M; Snow PB; Brandt JM; Partin AW
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(8 Suppl):1661-6. PubMed ID: 11309765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial neural network for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in a Taiwanese population.
Tsao CW; Liu CY; Cha TL; Wu ST; Sun GH; Yu DS; Chen HI; Chang SY; Chen SC; Hsu CY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Oct; 77(10):513-8. PubMed ID: 25175002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 15596191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of artificial neural network analysis to improve the predictive accuracy of prostate biopsy in the Japanese population.
Matsui Y; Utsunomiya N; Ichioka K; Ueda N; Yoshimura K; Terai A; Arai Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2004 Oct; 34(10):602-7. PubMed ID: 15591458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of 2001 Partin tables in Turkey: a multicenter study.
Eskicorapci SY; Karabulut E; Türkeri L; Baltaci S; Cal C; Toktas G; Akpinar H; Ozer G; Sozen S; Tokuc R; Lekili M; Soylu A; Albayrak S; Sahin H; Alpar R; Ozen H
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15661412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancers detected by saturation repeat biopsy impairs the Partin tables' accuracy to predict final pathological stage.
Augustin H; Auprich M; Mannweiler S; Pachernegg O; Al-Ali BM; Pummer K
BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 22093162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
