137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12579478)
1. Superiority of bilateral cochlear implantation over unilateral cochlear implantation in tone discrimination in chinese patients.
Au DK; Hui Y; Wei WI
Am J Otolaryngol; 2003; 24(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 12579478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Speech discrimination with bilateral cochlear implants in noisy conditions].
Au KK; Jin H; Hui Y; Wei L
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Dec; 36(6):433-5. PubMed ID: 12761958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tone perception of Cantonese-speaking prelingually hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants.
Wong AO; Wong LL
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Jun; 130(6):751-8. PubMed ID: 15195063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
Mosnier I; Sterkers O; Bebear JP; Godey B; Robier A; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Bordure P; Mondain M; Bouccara D; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(2):106-14. PubMed ID: 18832816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: localization and hearing in noise benefits.
Vincent C; Bébéar JP; Radafy E; Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Lautissier S; Bordure P
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 76(6):858-64. PubMed ID: 22436413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
Lorens A; Polak M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From hearing screening to cochlear implantation: cochlear implants in children under 3 years of age.
Profant M; Kabátová Z; Simková L
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 18368567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Central effects of residual hearing: implications for choice of ear for cochlear implantation.
Francis HW; Yeagle JD; Brightwell T; Venick H
Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1747-52. PubMed ID: 15454765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of stimulation rates on Cantonese lexical tone perception by cochlear implant users in Hong Kong.
Au DK
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2003 Dec; 28(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 14616671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review.
Brown KD; Balkany TJ
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 15(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 17823546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
