These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12579478)

  • 21. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech perception and localization with adults with bilateral sequential cochlear implants.
    Tyler RS; Dunn CC; Witt SA; Noble WG
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):86S-90S. PubMed ID: 17496655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Partial deafness cochlear implantation in children.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Piotrowska A; Anderson I
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1407-13. PubMed ID: 17597232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.
    Klop WM; Boermans PP; Ferrier MB; van den Hout WB; Stiggelbout AM; Frijns JH
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):615-21. PubMed ID: 18451751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1989; 32():1-25. PubMed ID: 2711118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants.
    Sagi E; Fitzgerald MB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 17609617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implantation of the ossified cochlea: management with the split electrode array.
    Millar DA; Hillman TA; Shelton C
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Dec; 115(12):2155-60. PubMed ID: 16369159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation.
    Morris LG; Mallur PS; Roland JT; Waltzman SB; Lalwani AK
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 17195742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lexical tone recognition in multi-talker babbles and steady-state noise by Mandarin-speaking children with unilateral cochlear implants or bimodal hearing.
    Meng C; Guo Q; Lyu J; Jaquish A; Chen X; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 182():112020. PubMed ID: 38964177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of potentially limiting factors on paediatric outcomes following cochlear implantation.
    Vlahović S; Sindija B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 68(9):1167-74. PubMed ID: 15302147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Binaural cochlear implant--good choice in the treatment of deep sensorinural hearing loss].
    Mârţu C; Cozma S; Rădulescu L; Mârţu D
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2011; 115(3):826-33. PubMed ID: 22046794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech performance and sound localization abilities in Neurelec Digisonic® SP binaural cochlear implant users.
    Verhaert N; Lazard DS; Gnansia D; Bébéar JP; Romanet P; Meyer B; Péan V; Mollard D; Truy E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 22584289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.