These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12579618)

  • 41. Strength of evidence, extraevidentiary influence, and the liberation hypothesis: data from the field.
    Devine DJ; Buddenbaum J; Houp S; Studebaker N; Stolle DP
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Apr; 33(2):136-48. PubMed ID: 18546064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
    Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An archival analysis of actual cases of historic child sexual abuse: A comparison of jury and bench trials.
    Read JD; Connolly DA; Welsh A
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):259-85. PubMed ID: 16786401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The court of public opinion: lay perceptions of polygraph testing.
    Myers B; Latter R; Abdollahi-Arena MK
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):509-23. PubMed ID: 16718577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The impact of mock jury gender composition on deliberations and conviction rates in a child sexual assault trial.
    Golding JM; Bradshaw GS; Dunlap EE; Hodell EC
    Child Maltreat; 2007 May; 12(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 17446571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
    Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
    Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effects of defendant conduct on jury damage awards.
    Greene E; Johns M; Smith A
    J Appl Psychol; 2001 Apr; 86(2):228-37. PubMed ID: 11393436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. When jurors' moral judgments result in jury nullification: moral outrage at the law as a mediator of euthanasia attitudes on verdicts.
    Peter-Hagene LC; Ratliff CL
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(1):27-49. PubMed ID: 34552378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mock trial jury decisions as a function of adolescent juror guilt and hostility.
    Ackerman AM; McMahon PM; Fehr LA
    J Genet Psychol; 1984 Jun; 144(2d Half):195-201. PubMed ID: 6736944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
    Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
    Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
    Margoni F; Brown TR
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Juror Decision Making and Euthanasia: Exploring the Role of Jury Nullification, Manner of Death, and Defendant-Decedent Relationship.
    Scott JD; Bell D; Barry B; Edlund JE
    Psychol Rep; 2023 Dec; 126(6):3052-3070. PubMed ID: 35484479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Describing, diagnosing, and naming psychopathy: how do youth psychopathy labels influence jurors?
    Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Clark JW; Cornell DG
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(4):487-510. PubMed ID: 18683203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations.
    Haegerich TM; Bottoms BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2000 Aug; 24(4):421-48. PubMed ID: 10974801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
    Maeder EM; McManus LA
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. "Race salience" in juror decision-making: misconceptions, clarifications, and unanswered questions.
    Sommers SR; Ellsworth PC
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 19513991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The impact of frequency of behavior and type of contact on judgments involving a criminal stalking case.
    Magyarics CL; Lynch KR; Golding JM; Lippert A
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Dec; 39(6):602-13. PubMed ID: 26237334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A trap for the unwary: jury decision making in cases involving the entrapment defense.
    Peters CS; Lampinen JM; Malesky LA
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Feb; 37(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 22775305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.