66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12580846)
1. Quality improvement project in cervical cancer screening: practical measures for monitoring laboratory performance.
Tarkkanen J; Geagea A; Nieminen P; Anttila A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jan; 82(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 12580846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of type of screening laboratory on population-based occurrence of cervical lesions in Finland.
Nieminen P; Hakama M; Tarkkanen J; Anttila A
Int J Cancer; 2002 Jun; 99(5):732-6. PubMed ID: 12115508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Computer-assisted screening for cervical carcinoma--the results for a 10-year period].
Neumann HG; Seidenschnur G
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1987; 57(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 3296989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Six years' audit of laboratory workload and rates of referral for colposcopy in a cervical screening programme in three districts.
Raffle AE; Alden B; Mackenzie EF
BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):907-11. PubMed ID: 2261537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The role of the cytological screening, HPV-test and the colposcopy for early detection of the precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(9):45-9. PubMed ID: 18646309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rationale and development of an on-line quality assurance programme for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy.
Bucchi L; Cristiani P; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Garutti P; Sassoli de Bianchi P; Naldoni C; Olea O; Sideri M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Jun; 13():237. PubMed ID: 23809615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Letter: Increase of premalignant cervical lesions in teenagers.
Punnonen R; Grönroos M; Peltonen R
Lancet; 1974 Oct; 2(7886):949. PubMed ID: 4138326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The role of colposcopy in Population Program of Cervical Cancer Early Detection].
Wojciech R
Ginekol Pol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):719-22. PubMed ID: 18159827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Status of screening tests for cervical cancer and its precancerous lesion].
Zhao FH; Rong SD; Qiao YL
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2001 Dec; 23(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 12901114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme of Bangladesh and the formulation of quality assurance guidelines.
Basu P; Nessa A; Majid M; Rahman JN; Ahmed T
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2010 Jul; 36(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 20659365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized controlled trial of human papillomavirus testing versus Pap cytology in the primary screening for cervical cancer precursors: design, methods and preliminary accrual results of the Canadian cervical cancer screening trial (CCCaST).
Mayrand MH; Duarte-Franco E; Coutlée F; Rodrigues I; Walter SD; Ratnam S; Franco EL;
Int J Cancer; 2006 Aug; 119(3):615-23. PubMed ID: 16572425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significant variation in performance does not reflect the effectiveness of the cervical cancer screening programme in Finland.
Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Nieminen P; Hakama M; Seppänen J; Ikkala J; Martikainen J; Tarkkanen J; Toivonen T; Anttila A
Eur J Cancer; 2007 Jan; 43(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 17049228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is it relevant to screen women younger than 26 years for precancerous and malignant cervical lesions ?
Ghosh A; Rao S; Pramanik T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):123-4. PubMed ID: 16101318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High lifetime probability of screen-detected cervical abnormalities.
Pankakoski M; Heinävaara S; Sarkeala T; Anttila A
J Med Screen; 2017 Dec; 24(4):201-207. PubMed ID: 28073308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.
Nowakowski A; Cybulski M; Śliwczyński A; Chil A; Teter Z; Seroczyński P; Arbyn M; Anttila A
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():279. PubMed ID: 25879466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cervical smears: towards an optimal screening for cervical cancer].
Leroy JL; Boman F
Presse Med; 2003 Feb; 32(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 12610474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
