These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12581008)

  • 1. Site-specific positive margins at radical prostatectomy: assessing cancer-control benefits of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle on a side with cancer on biopsy.
    Park EL; Dalkin B; Escobar C; Nagle RB
    BJU Int; 2003 Feb; 91(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 12581008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and internal validation of a side-specific, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for the prediction of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.
    Martini A; Gupta A; Lewis SC; Cumarasamy S; Haines KG; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Tewari AK
    BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):1025-1033. PubMed ID: 29676063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate decreases positive margin rate while ensuring nerve sparing procedure during radical prostatectomy.
    von Bodman C; Brock M; Roghmann F; Byers A; Löppenberg B; Braun K; Pastor J; Sommerer F; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):515-20. PubMed ID: 23415965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.
    Goharderakhshan RZ; Sudilovsky D; Carroll LA; Grossfeld GD; Marn R; Carroll PR
    Urology; 2002 May; 59(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 11992845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
    Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Ward JF; Zincke H; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Myers RP; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2004 Oct; 172(4 Pt 1):1328-32. PubMed ID: 15371834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Excision of the neurovascular bundle at radical prostatectomy in cases with perineural invasion on needle biopsy.
    Holmes GF; Walsh PC; Pound CR; Epstein JI
    Urology; 1999 Apr; 53(4):752-6. PubMed ID: 10197851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue.
    Rabbani F; Vora KC; Yunis LH; Eastham JA; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Touijer K
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 19689577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of wide excision of the neurovascular bundle(s) on prognosis in men with clinically localized prostate cancer with established capsular penetration.
    Partin AW; Borland RN; Epstein JI; Brendler CB
    J Urol; 1993 Jul; 150(1):142-6; discussion 146-8. PubMed ID: 8510234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of nerve sparing on incidence and location of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy.
    Moore BM; Savdie R; PeBenito RA; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Delprado W; Rasiah KK; Stricker PD
    BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(4):533-8. PubMed ID: 21711436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potency following radical prostatectomy with wide unilateral excision of the neurovascular bundle.
    Walsh PC; Epstein JI; Lowe FC
    J Urol; 1987 Oct; 138(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 3656538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy: overview of sampling methods for frozen sections and techniques for the secondary resection of the neurovascular bundles.
    Sighinolfi MC; Eissa A; Spandri V; Puliatti S; Micali S; Reggiani Bonetti L; Bertoni L; Bianchi G; Rocco B
    BJU Int; 2020 May; 125(5):656-663. PubMed ID: 32012426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Erectile Function Recovery after Radical Prostatectomy in Men with High Risk Features.
    Recabal P; Assel M; Musser JE; Caras RJ; Sjoberg DD; Coleman JA; Mulhall JP; Parra RO; Scardino PT; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Laudone VP
    J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):507-13. PubMed ID: 26905018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 prostate cancer.
    Bigg SW; Kavoussi LR; Catalona WJ
    J Urol; 1990 Dec; 144(6):1420-4. PubMed ID: 1700156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: current evaluation of surgical margins in clinically low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer.
    Yee DS; Narula N; Amin MB; Skarecky DW; Ahlering TE
    J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1461-5. PubMed ID: 19619065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy capsular margins of resection. The significance of margins designated as negative, closely approaching, and positive.
    Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1990 Jul; 14(7):626-32. PubMed ID: 2356922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.