204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12581034)
1. Satisfaction with team midwifery care for low- and high-risk women: a randomized controlled trial.
Biró MA; Waldenström U; Brown S; Pannifex JH
Birth; 2003 Mar; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 12581034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does team midwife care increase satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care? A randomized controlled trial.
Waldenström U; Brown S; McLachlan H; Forster D; Brennecke S
Birth; 2000 Sep; 27(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 11251496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
Forster DA; McLachlan HL; Davey MA; Biro MA; Farrell T; Gold L; Flood M; Shafiei T; Waldenström U
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():28. PubMed ID: 26841782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial.
Biró MA; Waldenström U; Pannifex JH
Birth; 2000 Sep; 27(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 11251497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Continuity of care in maternity services: women's views of one team midwifery scheme.
Farquhar M; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Todd C
Midwifery; 2000 Mar; 16(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 11139860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwifery continuity of care versus standard maternity care for women at increased risk of preterm birth: A hybrid implementation-effectiveness, randomised controlled pilot trial in the UK.
Fernandez Turienzo C; Bick D; Briley AL; Bollard M; Coxon K; Cross P; Silverio SA; Singh C; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003350. PubMed ID: 33022010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experiences of maternity care among women at increased risk of preterm birth receiving midwifery continuity of care compared to women receiving standard care: Results from the POPPIE pilot trial.
Fernandez Turienzo C; Silverio SA; Coxon K; Brigante L; Seed PT; Shennan AH; Sandall J;
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0248588. PubMed ID: 33882059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuity of care by a midwife team versus routine care during pregnancy and birth: a randomised trial.
Rowley MJ; Hensley MJ; Brinsmead MW; Wlodarczyk JH
Med J Aust; 1995 Sep; 163(6):289-93. PubMed ID: 7565233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia.
Homer CS; Davis GK; Cooke M; Barclay LM
Midwifery; 2002 Jun; 18(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 12139908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of midwifery led care: assessing the effects of different models of continuity for women's satisfaction.
Morgan M; Fenwick N; McKenzie C; Wolfe CD
Qual Health Care; 1998 Jun; 7(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 10180794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of caseload midwifery, compared with standard care, on women's perceptions of antenatal care quality: Survey results from the M@NGO randomized controlled trial for women of any risk.
Allen J; Kildea S; Tracy MB; Hartz DL; Welsh AW; Tracy SK
Birth; 2019 Sep; 46(3):439-449. PubMed ID: 31231863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comprehensive maternity support and shared care in Switzerland: Comparison of levels of satisfaction.
Floris L; Irion O; Bonnet J; Politis Mercier MP; de Labrusse C
Women Birth; 2018 Apr; 31(2):124-133. PubMed ID: 28711398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial.
McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Lumley J; Farrell T; Oats J; Gold L; Waldenström U; Albers L; Biro MA
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Aug; 8():35. PubMed ID: 18680606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial.
McLachlan HL; Forster DA; Davey MA; Farrell T; Gold L; Biro MA; Albers L; Flood M; Oats J; Waldenström U
BJOG; 2012 Nov; 119(12):1483-92. PubMed ID: 22830446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Western Australian women's perceptions of the style and quality of midwifery postnatal care in hospital and at home.
Fenwick J; Butt J; Dhaliwal S; Hauck Y; Schmied V
Women Birth; 2010 Mar; 23(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 19632912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuity of carer and satisfaction.
Waldenström U
Midwifery; 1998 Dec; 14(4):207-13. PubMed ID: 10076315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are women's expectations and preferences for intrapartum care affected by the model of care on offer?
Hundley V; Ryan M
BJOG; 2004 Jun; 111(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 15198782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midwife-led continuity of care increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care: North Shoa, Amhara regional state, Ethiopia: A quasi-experimental study.
Hailemeskel S; Alemu K; Christensson K; Tesfahun E; Lindgren H
Women Birth; 2022 Nov; 35(6):553-562. PubMed ID: 35067458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Women's expectations on antenatal care as assessed in early pregnancy: number of visits, continuity of caregiver and general content.
Hildingsson I; Waldenström U; Rådestad I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Feb; 81(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 11942901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Team midwifery: the views and job satisfaction of midwives.
Todd CJ; Farquhar MC; Camilleri-Ferrante C
Midwifery; 1998 Dec; 14(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 10076316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
