These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12581282)
21. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold to treat malignant in-stent restenosis in a patient with nickel allergy. Jurado-Román A; López-Lluva MT; Sánchez-Pérez I; Piqueras-Flores J; Maseda R; Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda F Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017 Sep; 18(6S1):38-40. PubMed ID: 28089777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patch test results in schoolchildren. Results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Brasch J; Geier J Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Dec; 37(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 9455632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A single center investigation of bare-metal or drug-eluting stent restenosis from 1633 consecutive Chinese Han ethnic patients. Xu B; Li JJ; Yang YJ; Ma WH; Chen JL; Qiao SB; Qin XW; Yao M; Liu HB; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; You SJ; Dai J; Xia R; Gao RL Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Apr; 119(7):533-8. PubMed ID: 16620692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Hand dermatitis and allergic patch test reactions caused by nickel in electroplaters. Kanerva L; Kiilunen M; Jolanki R; Estlander T; Aitio A Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Mar; 36(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 9145262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Unexpected sensitization routes and general frequency of contact allergies in an elderly stented Swedish population. Svedman C; Ekqvist S; Möller H; Björk J; Gruvberger B; Holmström E; Bruze M Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17577375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Nickel allergy, Kounis syndrome and intracardiac metal devices. Almpanis GC; Tsigkas GG; Koutsojannis C; Mazarakis A; Kounis GN; Kounis NG Int J Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 145(2):364-365. PubMed ID: 20207036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prevention of nickel-induced allergic contact reactions with pentoxifylline. Saricaoğlu H; Tunali S; Bülbül E; White IR; Palali Z Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 9840261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants. Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is it possible to improve the prognosis in nickel contact dermatitis? Kalimo K; Lammintausta K; Jalava J; Niskanen T Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Sep; 37(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 9330818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J; Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiple sensitivities to transition metals: the nickel palladium reactions. Santucci B; Cannistraci C; Cristaudo A; Picardo M Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Nov; 35(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 9007373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rôle of ear piercing in metal allergic contact dermatitis. Nakada T; Iijima M; Nakayama H; Maibach HI Contact Dermatitis; 1997 May; 36(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 9197955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Patch testing with nickel sulfate versus nickel chloride. Räsänen L; Mattila U; Kalimo K Contact Dermatitis; 1999 May; 40(5):287-8. PubMed ID: 10344493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Positive strip patch test reactions with coexistent negative patch test reactions. Relevance for the assessment practice of occupational skin disease]. Scola N; Hunzelmann N; Ruzicka T; Kobus S; Adamek E; Altmeyer P; Dickel H Hautarzt; 2010 Dec; 61(12):1056-60. PubMed ID: 20664991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective randomized comparison of early and late results of a carbonized stent versus a high-grade stainless steel stent of identical design: the PREVENT Trial [corrected]. Sick PB; Brosteanu O; Ulrich M; Thiele H; Niebauer J; Busch I; Schuler G Am Heart J; 2005 Apr; 149(4):681-8. PubMed ID: 15990753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]