These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12581282)

  • 21. Bioresorbable vascular scaffold to treat malignant in-stent restenosis in a patient with nickel allergy.
    Jurado-Román A; López-Lluva MT; Sánchez-Pérez I; Piqueras-Flores J; Maseda R; Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda F
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017 Sep; 18(6S1):38-40. PubMed ID: 28089777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patch test results in schoolchildren. Results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
    Brasch J; Geier J
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Dec; 37(6):286-93. PubMed ID: 9455632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A single center investigation of bare-metal or drug-eluting stent restenosis from 1633 consecutive Chinese Han ethnic patients.
    Xu B; Li JJ; Yang YJ; Ma WH; Chen JL; Qiao SB; Qin XW; Yao M; Liu HB; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; You SJ; Dai J; Xia R; Gao RL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Apr; 119(7):533-8. PubMed ID: 16620692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hand dermatitis and allergic patch test reactions caused by nickel in electroplaters.
    Kanerva L; Kiilunen M; Jolanki R; Estlander T; Aitio A
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Mar; 36(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 9145262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Unexpected sensitization routes and general frequency of contact allergies in an elderly stented Swedish population.
    Svedman C; Ekqvist S; Möller H; Björk J; Gruvberger B; Holmström E; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17577375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nickel allergy, Kounis syndrome and intracardiac metal devices.
    Almpanis GC; Tsigkas GG; Koutsojannis C; Mazarakis A; Kounis GN; Kounis NG
    Int J Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 145(2):364-365. PubMed ID: 20207036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prevention of nickel-induced allergic contact reactions with pentoxifylline.
    Saricaoğlu H; Tunali S; Bülbül E; White IR; Palali Z
    Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):244-7. PubMed ID: 9840261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants.
    Jøhnke H; Norberg LA; Vach W; Bindslev-Jensen C; Høst A; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):141-7. PubMed ID: 15479203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is it possible to improve the prognosis in nickel contact dermatitis?
    Kalimo K; Lammintausta K; Jalava J; Niskanen T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Sep; 37(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 9330818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
    Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Allergic contact dermatitis in Iran.
    Kashani MN; Gorouhi F; Behnia F; Nazemi MJ; Dowlati Y; Firooz A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Mar; 52(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 15811031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiple sensitivities to transition metals: the nickel palladium reactions.
    Santucci B; Cannistraci C; Cristaudo A; Picardo M
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Nov; 35(5):283-6. PubMed ID: 9007373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rôle of ear piercing in metal allergic contact dermatitis.
    Nakada T; Iijima M; Nakayama H; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 May; 36(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 9197955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patch testing with nickel sulfate versus nickel chloride.
    Räsänen L; Mattila U; Kalimo K
    Contact Dermatitis; 1999 May; 40(5):287-8. PubMed ID: 10344493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Positive strip patch test reactions with coexistent negative patch test reactions. Relevance for the assessment practice of occupational skin disease].
    Scola N; Hunzelmann N; Ruzicka T; Kobus S; Adamek E; Altmeyer P; Dickel H
    Hautarzt; 2010 Dec; 61(12):1056-60. PubMed ID: 20664991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prospective randomized comparison of early and late results of a carbonized stent versus a high-grade stainless steel stent of identical design: the PREVENT Trial [corrected].
    Sick PB; Brosteanu O; Ulrich M; Thiele H; Niebauer J; Busch I; Schuler G
    Am Heart J; 2005 Apr; 149(4):681-8. PubMed ID: 15990753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical expression of nickel contact dermatitis primed by diagnostic patch test.
    Theler B; Bucher C; French LE; Ballmer Weber B; Hofbauer GF
    Dermatology; 2009; 219(1):73-6. PubMed ID: 19349696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Allergic Sensitization to Nickel and Implanted Metal Devices: A Perspective.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Dermatitis; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 33(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 34845168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
    Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
    Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The impact of metallic allergy on stent implantation: metal allergy and recurrence of in-stent restenosis.
    Iijima R; Ikari Y; Amiya E; Tanimoto S; Nakazawa G; Kyono H; Hatori M; Miyazawa A; Nakayama T; Aoki J; Nakajima H; Hara K
    Int J Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 104(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 16186063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.