These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

504 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12582781)

  • 1. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T; Naito Y; Hirai T; Yamaguchi S; Ito J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
    Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
    Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Polak M; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Szkielkowska A; Skarzynski PH
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Value of intracochlear electrically evoked auditory brainstem response after cochlear implantation in patients with narrow internal auditory canal.
    Song MH; Bae MR; Kim HN; Lee WS; Yang WS; Choi JY
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Aug; 120(8):1625-31. PubMed ID: 20564653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting.
    Botros A; Psarros C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 20124902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brain stem responses evoked by stimulation with an auditory brain stem implant in children with cochlear nerve aplasia or hypoplasia.
    O'Driscoll M; El-Deredy W; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L; Ramsden RT
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):300-12. PubMed ID: 21150625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    Teagle HF; Roush PA; Woodard JS; Hatch DR; Zdanski CJ; Buss E; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 20090530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.