These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12583453)

  • 1. The reliability of assessing the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests.
    Bindels R; Hasman A; van Wersch JW; Pop P; Winkens RA
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12583453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of the assessment of appropriateness of diagnostic test request behavior.
    Bindels R; Winkens RA; van Wersch JW; Pop P; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1112-5. PubMed ID: 11604901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of feedback on test ordering behaviour of general practitioners.
    Winkens RA; Pop P; Grol RP; Kester AD; Knottnerus JA
    BMJ; 1992 Apr; 304(6834):1093-6. PubMed ID: 1586825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reliability of peer assessments. A meta-analysis.
    Goldman RL
    Eval Health Prof; 1994 Mar; 17(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 10132480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Panellist consistency in the assessment of medical appropriateness.
    McDonnell J; Meijler A; Kahan JP; Bernstein SJ; Rigter H
    Health Policy; 1996 Sep; 37(3):139-52. PubMed ID: 10160019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Design of a decision support system for test ordering in general practice: choices and decisions to make.
    van Wijk M; Mosseveld M; van der Lei J
    Methods Inf Med; 1999 Dec; 38(4-5):355-61. PubMed ID: 10805028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing assessment of appropriateness of diagnostic tests between a human expert and an automated reminder system.
    Bindels R; Winkens RA; van Wersch JW; Pop P; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():239-43. PubMed ID: 11187550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The appropriateness method has acceptable reliability and validity for assessing overuse and underuse of surgical procedures.
    Lawson EH; Gibbons MM; Ko CY; Shekelle PG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1133-43. PubMed ID: 23017632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of family physicians' performance using patient charts: interrater reliability and concordance with chart-stimulated recall interview.
    Goulet F; Jacques A; Gagnon R; Racette P; Sieber W
    Eval Health Prof; 2007 Dec; 30(4):376-92. PubMed ID: 17986671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
    Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT
    JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1573-8. PubMed ID: 9370502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the care of general medicine inpatients: how good is implicit review?
    Hayward RA; McMahon LF; Bernard AM
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(7):550-6. PubMed ID: 8442625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of decision support for blood test ordering in primary care. a randomized trial.
    van Wijk MA; van der Lei J; Mosseveld M; Bohnen AM; van Bemmel JH
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Feb; 134(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 11182837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inter- and intrarater reliability of retrospective drug utilization reviewers.
    Zuckerman IH; Mulhearn DM; Metge CJ
    J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash); 1999; 39(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9990187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appropriateness of hospital utilization. The validity and reliability of the Intensity-Severity-Discharge Review System in a United Kingdom acute hospital setting.
    Inglis AL; Coast J; Gray SF; Peters TJ; Frankel SJ
    Med Care; 1995 Sep; 33(9):952-7. PubMed ID: 7666708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: a randomized trial.
    Verstappen WH; van der Weijden T; Sijbrandij J; Smeele I; Hermsen J; Grimshaw J; Grol RP
    JAMA; 2003 May; 289(18):2407-12. PubMed ID: 12746365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of the medication appropriateness index in Dutch residential home.
    Stuijt CC; Franssen EJ; Egberts AC; Hudson SA
    Pharm World Sci; 2009 Jun; 31(3):380-6. PubMed ID: 19280363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer and expert opinion and the reliability of implicit case review.
    Margo CE
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):614-8. PubMed ID: 11874771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality.
    Hofer TP; Bernstein SJ; DeMonner S; Hayward RA
    Med Care; 2000 Feb; 38(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 10659689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A test ordering system with automated reminders for primary care based on practice guidelines.
    Bindels R; de Clercq PA; Winkens RA; Hasman A
    Int J Med Inform; 2000 Sep; 58-59():219-33. PubMed ID: 10978923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lost in translation? Reliability of assessing inpatient antimicrobial appropriateness with use of computerized case vignettes.
    Schwartz DN; Wu US; Lyles RD; Xiang Y; Kieszkowski P; Hota B; Weinstein RA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 30(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19090769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.