These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12583888)

  • 1. Concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady state evoked potentials.
    Purcell DW; John MS; Picton TW
    Hear Res; 2003 Feb; 176(1-2):128-41. PubMed ID: 12583888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.
    Oswald JA; Rosner T; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3886-95. PubMed ID: 16838532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
    Vetesník A; Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for multiple DPOAE components based upon group delay of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion in the gerbil.
    Faulstich M; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 140(1-2):99-110. PubMed ID: 10675638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous latency estimations for distortion product otoacoustic emissions and envelope following responses.
    Purcell DW; Van Roon P; John MS; Picton TW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2869-80. PubMed ID: 16708945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic validity of dichotic multiple frequencies auditory steady-state responses versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening of high risk neonates.
    Mahmoudian S; Farhadi M; Kadivar M; Ghalehbaghi B; Rahimi F; Hemami MR; Kamrava SK; Asghari A; Amintehran E; Mohagheghi P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1109-16. PubMed ID: 21719120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cortical responses to the 2f1-f2 combination tone measured indirectly using magnetoencephalography.
    Purcell DW; Ross B; Picton TW; Pantev C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):992-1003. PubMed ID: 17672647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristic findings of auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emission in the Bronx waltzer mouse.
    Inagaki M; Kon K; Suzuki S; Kobayashi N; Kaga M; Nanba E
    Brain Dev; 2006 Nov; 28(10):617-24. PubMed ID: 16730938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.
    Martin GK; Villasuso EI; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2003 Mar; 177(1-2):111-22. PubMed ID: 12618323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE; Long KM; Lees SE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Latencies of auditory steady-state responses recorded in early infancy.
    Alaerts J; Luts H; Van Dun B; Desloovere C; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 19657187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection and differentiation of sensorineural hearing loss in mice using auditory steady-state responses and transient auditory brainstem responses.
    Pauli-Magnus D; Hoch G; Strenzke N; Anderson S; Jentsch TJ; Moser T
    Neuroscience; 2007 Nov; 149(3):673-84. PubMed ID: 17869440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.