203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12583945)
1. Admission cardiotocography: a randomised controlled trial.
Impey L; Reynolds M; MacQuillan K; Gates S; Murphy J; Sheil O
Lancet; 2003 Feb; 361(9356):465-70. PubMed ID: 12583945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement.
Daly N; Brennan D; Foley M; O'Herlihy C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21899943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart rate: effects on neonatal Apgar score, on the rate of caesarean sections and on the rate of instrumental delivery--a systematic review.
Gourounti K; Sandall J
Int J Nurs Stud; 2007 Aug; 44(6):1029-35. PubMed ID: 16919279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in low-risk pregnancy during evaluation for possible labour admission - a multicentre randomised trial: the ADCAR trial.
Smith V; Begley C; Newell J; Higgins S; Murphy DJ; White MJ; Morrison JJ; Canny S; O'Donovan D; Devane D
BJOG; 2019 Jan; 126(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 30126064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric population.
Mires G; Williams F; Howie P
BMJ; 2001 Jun; 322(7300):1457-60; discussion 1460-2. PubMed ID: 11408301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography--a randomised controlled study.
Ojala K; Vääräsmäki M; Mäkikallio K; Valkama M; Tekay A
BJOG; 2006 Apr; 113(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 16553653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 25040705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.
Herbst A; Ingemarsson I
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Amer-Wåhlin I; Hellsten C; Norén H; Hagberg H; Herbst A; Kjellmer I; Lilja H; Lindoff C; Månsson M; Mårtensson L; Olofsson P; Sundström A; Marsál K
Lancet; 2001 Aug; 358(9281):534-8. PubMed ID: 11520523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.
Westerhuis ME; Moons KG; van Beek E; Bijvoet SM; Drogtrop AP; van Geijn HP; van Lith JM; Mol BW; Nijhuis JG; Oei SG; Porath MM; Rijnders RJ; Schuitemaker NW; van der Tweel I; Visser GH; Willekes C; Kwee A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2007 Jul; 7():13. PubMed ID: 17655764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normal and indeterminate pattern of fetal cardiotocography in admission test and pregnancy outcome.
Sharbaf FR; Amjadi N; Alavi A; Akbari S; Forghani F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Mar; 40(3):694-9. PubMed ID: 24738115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Delay in intervention increases neonatal morbidity in births monitored with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis.
Kessler J; Moster D; Albrechtsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Feb; 93(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 24251909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cardiotocography admission monitoring and intermittent intrapartum monitoring for fetal distress in labour].
Yan P
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Apr; 28(4):217-9, 253. PubMed ID: 8404305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Admission tests other than cardiotocography for fetal assessment during labour.
Khunpradit S; Lumbiganon P; Laopaiboon M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jun; 2011(6):CD008410. PubMed ID: 21678377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: an observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon.
Massoud M; Giannesi A; Amabile N; Manevy M; Geron G; Gaucherand P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Nov; 20(11):819-24. PubMed ID: 17943643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Home telemonitoring versus hospital care in complicated pregnancies in the Netherlands: a randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial (HoTeL).
Bekker MN; Koster MPH; Keusters WR; Ganzevoort W; de Haan-Jebbink JM; Deurloo KL; Seeber L; van der Ham DP; Zuithoff NPA; Frederix GWJ; van den Heuvel JFM; Franx A
Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Mar; 5(3):e116-e124. PubMed ID: 36828605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus PR-interval analysis in intrapartum surveillance: a randomised, multicentre trial. FECG Study Group.
Strachan BK; van Wijngaarden WJ; Sahota D; Chang A; James DK
Lancet; 2000 Feb; 355(9202):456-9. PubMed ID: 10841126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
