1036 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12584122)
1. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
Datta S; Datta S
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
Lu X; Perkins DL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How accurately can we control the FDR in analyzing microarray data?
Jung SH; Jang W
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):1730-6. PubMed ID: 16644791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis.
Jung SH
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(14):3097-104. PubMed ID: 15845654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
Liu P; Hwang JT
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving false discovery rate estimation.
Pounds S; Cheng C
Bioinformatics; 2004 Jul; 20(11):1737-45. PubMed ID: 14988112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rank-invariant resampling based estimation of false discovery rate for analysis of small sample microarray data.
Jain N; Cho H; O'Connell M; Lee JK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 6():187. PubMed ID: 16042779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiplicity issues in microarray experiments.
Bretz F; Landgrebe J; Brunner E
Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 16113769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A mixture model approach to sample size estimation in two-sample comparative microarray experiments.
Jørstad TS; Midelfart H; Bones AM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():117. PubMed ID: 18298817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of oligonucleotide array experiments with repeated measures using mixed models.
Li H; Wood CL; Getchell TV; Getchell ML; Stromberg AJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 5():209. PubMed ID: 15626348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments using local FDR.
Aubert J; Bar-Hen A; Daudin JJ; Robin S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 5():125. PubMed ID: 15350197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD; Xu H
Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FDR-controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays.
Li SS; Bigler J; Lampe JW; Potter JD; Feng Z
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2267-80. PubMed ID: 15977294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
