BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12584636)

  • 1. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study.
    Jung M; Beilenhoff U; Pietsch M; Kraft B; Rippin G
    Endoscopy; 2003 Mar; 35(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 12584636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of cleaning, function, adequacy of tissue specimen, and durability.
    Kozarek RA; Attia FM; Sumida SE; Raltz SL; Roach SK; Schembre DB; Brandabur JJ; Ball TJ; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Patterson DJ; Bredfeldt JE; Gelfand M; McCormick SE; Drajpuch DB; Moran DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Jun; 53(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 11375582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.
    Raltz SL; Kozarek RA; Pethigal PA; Moorhouse MA; Merriam LD
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1995; 18(5):167-70. PubMed ID: 7578296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].
    Lejeune C; Prost P; Michiels C; Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP; Phelip JM; Martin L; Rassiat E; Faivre J
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contamination of single-use biopsy forceps: a prospective in vitro analysis.
    Kinney TP; Kozarek RA; Raltz S; Attia F
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Aug; 56(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 12145598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?
    Fireman Z
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16824057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reprocessing practice in digestive endoscopy units of district hospitals: results of a Portuguese National Survey.
    Soares JB; Gonçalves R; Banhudo A; Pedrosa J
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Nov; 23(11):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21862930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of quality assessment assurance in 2002 (before starting the German colorectal cancer screening programme by colonoscopy) on the quality of reprocessing of flexible endoscopes--a nationwide analysis].
    Fröhlich E; Muller R; Leiss O
    Z Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 47(11):1137-44. PubMed ID: 19899021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GI endoscopic reprocessing practices in the United States.
    Cheung RJ; Ortiz D; DiMarino AJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Sep; 50(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 10462657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?
    Muscarella LF
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2001; 24(2):64-8. PubMed ID: 11847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manual methods are suboptimal compared with automated methods for cleaning of single-use biopsy forceps.
    Alfa MJ; Nemes R; Olson N; Mulaire A
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 27(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 16874645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inconsistencies in endoscope-reprocessing and infection-control guidelines: the importance of endoscope drying.
    Muscarella LF
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 101(9):2147-54. PubMed ID: 16968511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of sterilization of reusable endoscopic biopsy forceps by autoclaving and ethylene oxide gas.
    Yoon JH; Yoon BC; Lee HL; Lee JK; Kim YT; Lee DH; Choi IJ; Lee DH; Kim DH
    Dig Dis Sci; 2012 Feb; 57(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 21904859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories - an international comparison of guidelines].
    Leiss O; Beilenhoff U; Bader L; Jung M; Exner M
    Z Gastroenterol; 2002 Jul; 40(7):531-42. PubMed ID: 12122603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination.
    Heeg P; Roth K; Reichl R; Cogdill CP; Bond WW
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):542-9. PubMed ID: 11732782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.
    Deprez PH; Horsmans Y; Van Hassel M; Hoang P; Piessevaux H; Geubel A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2000 Mar; 51(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 10699768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [HYGEA (Hygiene in gastroenterology--endoscope reprocessing): Study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting].
    Bader L; Blumenstock G; Birkner B; Leiss O; Heesemann J; Riemann JF; Selbmann HK
    Z Gastroenterol; 2002 Mar; 40(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 11901449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of high-level disinfectants for reprocessing GI endoscopes in simulated-use testing.
    Foliente RL; Kovacs BJ; Aprecio RM; Bains HJ; Kettering JD; Chen YK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Apr; 53(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 11275886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reprocessing endoscopes: United States perspective.
    Rutala WA; Weber DJ
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56 Suppl 2():S27-39. PubMed ID: 15110120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study and in vivo application of a reusable double-channel sphincterotome.
    Kozarek RA; Raltz SL; Brandabur JJ; Patterson DJ; Ball TJ; Gluck MG; Sumida SE; Roach SK; Drajpuch DE; Irizarry DL
    Endoscopy; 2001 May; 33(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 11396756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.