These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12585316)
21. Neonatal genetic testing is more than screening. Kenner C; Lewis JA; Pressler JL; Little CM Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2008 Jun; 20(2):233-7, vii. PubMed ID: 18424352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ending the genetic discrimination barrier: regaining confidence in preconception, prenatal, and neonatal genetic testing. Lovejoy W South Calif Law Rev; 2001 Mar; 74(3):873-901. PubMed ID: 16437819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Who Knows What, and When?: A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies. Hazel JW; Slobogin C Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2018; 28(1):35-66. PubMed ID: 30840416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Spider silk jeans or spider silk genes? The future of genetic testing in the workplace. Feitshans IL N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 2001; 18(1):13-49. PubMed ID: 12962108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The medical examination in United States immigration applications: the potential use of genetic testing leads to heightened privacy concerns. Burroughs AM J Biolaw Bus; 2005; 8(4):22-32. PubMed ID: 16619448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. HIPAA and what institutional review boards (IRBs) do not have to review. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 15027429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethics and genetics. Cunningham G N Engl J Med; 2003 Nov; 349(19):1870-2; author reply 1870-2. PubMed ID: 14602889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Privacy rights in personal information: HIPAA and the privacy gap between fundamental privacy rights and medical information. Davis KB John Marshall J Comput Inf Law; 2001; 19(4):535-55. PubMed ID: 16331877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Health and human services' privacy proposal: a failed attempt at health information privacy protection. Zoeller B Brandeis Law J; 2002; 40(4):1065-84. PubMed ID: 12705241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The legal implications of genetic testing. Scanlon C RN; 1998 Mar; 61(3):61-5. PubMed ID: 9544096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. National health information privacy and new federalism. Hodge JG Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 2000; 14(2):791-820. PubMed ID: 12705273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Privacy task forces and commissions in the states. Thaemert R NCSL Legisbrief; 2002 Feb; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11852941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Challenging medical-legal norms. The role of autonomy, confidentiality, and privacy in protecting individual and familial group rights in genetic information. Laurie GT J Leg Med; 2001 Mar; 22(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11330121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The genetic key to public health. Johnson A State Legis; 2003 Feb; 29(2):28-30. PubMed ID: 12577976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Privacy and confidentiality in the age of genetic engineering. Poste G Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 15706720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston. Barton EF Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):261-92. PubMed ID: 12645550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Legal Dimensions of Genomic Sequencing in Newborn Screening. Zacharias RL; Smith ME; King JS Hastings Cent Rep; 2018 Jul; 48 Suppl 2():S39-S41. PubMed ID: 30133728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]