177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12585659)
1. Maximum intensity projection analysis in magnetic resonance of the breast.
Carriero A; Di Credico A; Mansour M; Bonomo L
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):77-81. PubMed ID: 12585659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance of the breast: correlation between enhancement patterns and microvessel density in malignant tumors.
Carriero A; Ambrossini R; Mattei PA; Angelucci D; Bonomo L
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):83-7. PubMed ID: 12585660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
Cheung HS; Tse GM; Lai SY; Yeung DK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fusion of magnetic resonance and scintimammography images for breast cancer evaluation: a pilot study.
Duarte GM; Cabello C; Torresan RZ; Alvarenga M; Telles GH; Bianchessi ST; Caserta N; Segala SR; de Lima Mda C; Etchebehere EC; Camargo EE; Tinois E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2903-10. PubMed ID: 17632758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of benign and malignant sub-1 cm breast lesions using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Gibbs P; Liney GP; Lowry M; Kneeshaw PJ; Turnbull LW
Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15019691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic optical breast imaging: a novel technique to detect and characterize tumor vessels.
Fournier LS; Vanel D; Athanasiou A; Gatzemeier W; Masuykov IV; Padhani AR; Dromain C; Galetti K; Sigal R; Costa A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 18829193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast MR segmentation and lesion detection with cellular neural networks and 3D template matching.
Ertaş G; Gülçür HO; Osman O; Uçan ON; Tunaci M; Dursun M
Comput Biol Med; 2008 Jan; 38(1):116-26. PubMed ID: 17854795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.
Yoon LS; Catalano OA; Fritz S; Ferrone CR; Hahn PF; Sahani DV
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 19478628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the breast: Evaluation of ipsilateral increased vascularity and adjacent vessel sign in the characterization of breast lesions.
Kul S; Cansu A; Alhan E; Dinc H; Reis A; Çan G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1250-4. PubMed ID: 20966336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions.
Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative 2- and 3-dimensional analysis of pharmacokinetic model-derived variables for breast lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
Hauth EA; Jaeger HJ; Maderwald S; Muehler A; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Eur J Radiol; 2008 May; 66(2):300-8. PubMed ID: 17658235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
