BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12587103)

  • 1. Therapeutic equivalence: fallacies and falsification.
    Garrett AD
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):741-62. PubMed ID: 12587103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of non-compliance on intent-to-treat analysis of equivalence trials.
    Sheng D; Kim MY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1183-99. PubMed ID: 16220491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins.
    Dilba G; Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Guiard V
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16217842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size determination for assessing equivalence based on proportion ratio under a randomized trial with non-compliance and missing outcomes.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):47-67. PubMed ID: 17708514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.
    Christensen E
    J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion with dichotomous data.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF; Kotler ML
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1115-30. PubMed ID: 16381070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blinded sample size reassessment in non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
    Friede T; Kieser M
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):995-1007. PubMed ID: 12627414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of experimental treatments compared with standard treatments in non-inferiority trials: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Soonawala D; Middelburg RA; Egger M; Vandenbroucke JP; Dekkers OM
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1567-81. PubMed ID: 20837637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary: The debate on non-inferiority trials: 'when meta-analysis alone is not helpful'.
    Liberati A; D'Amico R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 39(6):1582-3. PubMed ID: 21113051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On non-inferiority margin and statistical tests in active control trials.
    Chow SC; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1101-13. PubMed ID: 16345042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data.
    Julious SA
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(12):1921-86. PubMed ID: 15195324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Equivalence trials: methodologic analysis.
    Carneiro A
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1125-39. PubMed ID: 14655314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Equivalence studies in cardiovascular diseases].
    Barbieri P; Marubini E
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Apr; 5(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 15346693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A mixed approach for proving non-inferiority in clinical trials with binary endpoints.
    Rousson V; Seifert B
    Biom J; 2008 Apr; 50(2):190-204. PubMed ID: 18311852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Size isn't everything.
    Hampton JR
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2807-14. PubMed ID: 12325096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The European regulatory experience.
    Lewis JA
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2931-8. PubMed ID: 12325109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological errors in staphylococcal equivalence study.
    Richards J; Black J; Marshall C
    Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Mar; 40(5):771-2; author reply 772-3. PubMed ID: 15714433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active-controlled, non-inferiority trials in oncology: arbitrary limits, infeasible sample sizes and uninformative data analysis. is there another way?
    Carroll KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 17128427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.