BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12587911)

  • 1. Estimation of a radiation time prolongation factor for intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Bakai A; Alber M; Nüsslin F
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jan; 48(2):N25-9. PubMed ID: 12587911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a quantitative index of beam modulation to characterize dose conformality: illustration by a comparison of full beamlet IMRT, few-segment IMRT (fsIMRT) and conformal unmodulated radiotherapy.
    Webb S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(14):2051-62. PubMed ID: 12894969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Algorithm and performance of a clinical IMRT beam-angle optimization system.
    Djajaputra D; Wu Q; Wu Y; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Oct; 48(19):3191-212. PubMed ID: 14579860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of beam intensity in a single step for IMRT inverse planning.
    Chuang KS; Chen TJ; Kuo SC; Jan ML; Hwang IM; Chen S; Lin YC; Wu J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Feb; 48(3):293-306. PubMed ID: 12608608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
    Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
    Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmentation of IMRT plans for radical lung radiotherapy delivery with the step-and-shoot technique.
    Nioutsikou E; Bedford JL; Christian JA; Brada M; Webb S
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):892-901. PubMed ID: 15125007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new algorithm for determining collimator angles that favor efficiency in MLC based IMRT delivery.
    Wang D; Hill RW; Lam S
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1249-53. PubMed ID: 15191316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT.
    Yang Y; Xing L; Li JG; Palta J; Chen Y; Luxton G; Boyer A
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2937-47. PubMed ID: 14655941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Independent monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated radiotherapy using the MIMiC multileaf collimator.
    Chen Z; Xing L; Nath R
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2041-51. PubMed ID: 12349925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of the number of control points has on isodose distributions in a dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery.
    Goraj A; de Boer SF
    Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 22572212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility study of beam orientation class-solutions for prostate IMRT.
    Schreibmann E; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2863-70. PubMed ID: 15543796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inverse planning for intensity-modulated arc therapy using direct aperture optimization.
    Earl MA; Shepard DM; Naqvi S; Li XA; Yu CX
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(8):1075-89. PubMed ID: 12741503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric comparison of split field and fixed jaw techniques for large IMRT target volumes in the head and neck.
    Srivastava SP; Das IJ; Kumar A; Johnstone PA
    Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 19944592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A dose delivery verification method for conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy using measured field fluence distributions.
    Renner WD; Sarfaraz M; Earl MA; Yu CX
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2996-3005. PubMed ID: 14655947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.
    Fu W; Yang Y; Yue NJ; Heron DE; Saiful Huq M
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23266161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical and dosimetric considerations in IMRT treatment planning for large target volumes.
    Malhotra HK; Raina S; Avadhani JS; deBoer S; Podgorsak MB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2005; 6(4):77-87. PubMed ID: 16421502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Dosimetry analysis of intensity-modulated and conformal radiation therapy for head and neck tumors].
    Pesznyák C; Béla D; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 26035156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
    Jones S; Williams M
    Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.