BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12588039)

  • 1. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63. PubMed ID: 12588039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications.
    Wei L; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN; Edwards A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1278-85. PubMed ID: 16229415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 15493691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic detection of microcalcifications using mathematical morphology and a support vector machine.
    Zhang E; Wang F; Li Y; Bai X
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 24211882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
    Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study on several machine-learning methods for classification of malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications.
    Wei L; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Mar; 24(3):371-80. PubMed ID: 15754987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SVM and neural networks comparison in mammographic CAD.
    García-Orellana CJ; Gallardo-Caballero R; Macías-Macias M; González-Velasco H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():3204-7. PubMed ID: 18002677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Heinlein P; Drexl J; Schneider W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 12760557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach.
    Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic detection of microcalcifications with multi-fractal spectrum.
    Ding Y; Dai H; Zhang H
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3049-54. PubMed ID: 25227013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel featureless approach to mass detection in digital mammograms based on support vector machines.
    Campanini R; Dongiovanni D; Iampieri E; Lanconelli N; Masotti M; Palermo G; Riccardi A; Roffilli M
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(6):961-75. PubMed ID: 15104319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise equalization for detection of microcalcification clusters in direct digital mammogram images.
    McLoughlin KJ; Bones PJ; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 15027524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model.
    Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):159. PubMed ID: 26745908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microcalcification detection based on wavelet domain hidden markov tree model: study for inclusion to computer aided diagnostic prompting system.
    Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
    Med Phys; 2007 Jun; 34(6):2206-19. PubMed ID: 17654922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: Study on applying adaboost with SVM-based component classifiers.
    Dehghan F; Abrishami-Moghaddam H; Giti M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4789-92. PubMed ID: 19163787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelet domain hidden Markov tree model.
    Regentova E; Zhang L; Zheng J; Veni G
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1972-5. PubMed ID: 17945686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for histological classification of clustered microcalcifications on magnification mammograms.
    Nakayama R; Uchiyama Y; Watanabe R; Katsuragawa S; Namba K; Doi K
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):789-99. PubMed ID: 15124996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
    Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
    Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
    Jebamony J; Jacob D
    Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.