220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12589285)
1. In vitro kinetic study of absorbency of retraction cords.
Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 12589285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Kinetic study of the liquid uptake of retraction cords].
Csempesz F; Vág J; Fazekas A
Fogorv Sz; 2002 Aug; 95(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 12236091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose-related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction.
Csillag M; Nyiri G; Vag J; Fazekas A
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17280885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Fluid Absorbency of Retraction Cords after Immersing in Two Retraction Medicaments - An In-vitro Study.
Vishnubhotla G; Basapogu S; Karnati RK; Dasari PP; Thommandru MV; Bethu MB
J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):ZC19-ZC22. PubMed ID: 28050497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluid absorbency of retraction cords after soaking in aluminum chloride solution.
Runyan DA; Reddy TG; Shimoda LM
J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Dec; 60(6):676-8. PubMed ID: 3060598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displacement.
Woody RD; Miller A; Staffanou RS
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 8371184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of different retraction techniques on crevicular fluid flow.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):215-6. PubMed ID: 18548958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface detail, compressive strength, and dimensional accuracy of gypsum casts after repeated immersion in hypochlorite solution.
Abdullah MA
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):462-8. PubMed ID: 16765160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Access to the intracrevicular space in preparations for fixed prosthesis].
Porzier J; Benner-Jordan L; Bourdeau B; Losfeld R
Cah Prothese; 1991 Mar; (73):6-20. PubMed ID: 2013007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of gingival retraction materials on gingival blood flow.
Polat NT; Ozdemir AK; Turgut M
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17319365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of diameter, chemical impregnation and hydration on the tensile strength of gingival retraction cords.
Del Rocío Nieto-Martínez M; Maupomé G; Barceló-Santana F
J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 28(12):1094-100. PubMed ID: 11874507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on the marginal fit of crowns.
Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Trost D; Balkenhol M
J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 18479801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction agents in beagle dogs.
Kopac I; Cvetko E; Marion L
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 11887594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Current methods of finish-line exposure by practicing prosthodontists.
Hansen PA; Tira DE; Barlow J
J Prosthodont; 1999 Sep; 8(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 10740498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords.
Jokstad A
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 10050111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
Liu CM; Huang FM; Yang LC; Chou LS; Chou MY; Chang YC
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Apr; 31(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 15089944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
