These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12589286)

  • 21. Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Davis EL; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19231572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):402-11. PubMed ID: 17174657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain.
    Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of shade tab arrangement on the repeatability and accuracy of shade selection.
    Yılmaz B; Yuzugullu B; Cınar D; Berksun S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 21640239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spectrophotometric and visual shade measurements of human teeth using three shade guides.
    Fani G; Vichi A; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2007 Jun; 20(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 17672253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility of tooth color gradation using a computer color-matching technique applied to ceramic restorations.
    Ishikawa-Nagai S; Ishibashi K; Tsuruta O; Weber HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Feb; 93(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 15674222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Color comparison of two shade guides.
    Paravina RD; Powers JM; Fay RM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 11887603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides.
    Alomari M; Chadwick RG
    Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth color reproduction.
    Da Silva JD; Park SE; Weber HP; Ishikawa-Nagai S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):361-8. PubMed ID: 18456047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching.
    Okubo SR; Kanawati A; Richards MW; Childress S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Dec; 80(6):642-8. PubMed ID: 9830067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual whiteness ranking of a Vitapan 3D Master shade guide by untrained assessors.
    Lath DL; Wildgoose DG; Guan H; Lilley TH; Smith RN; Brook AH
    J Clin Dent; 2006; 17(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 16838875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coverage error of three conceptually different shade guide systems to vital unrestored dentition.
    Bayindir F; Kuo S; Johnston WM; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):175-85. PubMed ID: 17854618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants.
    Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Matching repeatability and interdevice agreement of 2 intraoral spectrophotometers.
    Sarafianou A; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Goula H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 22385694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro model to evaluate reliability and accuracy of a dental shade-matching instrument.
    Kim-Pusateri S; Brewer JD; Dunford RG; Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 18021823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide.
    Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale.
    Ahn JS; Lee YK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 18589070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimation of visual shade matching errors with 2 shade guides.
    Oh WS; Koh IW; O'Brien WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2009; 40(10):833-6. PubMed ID: 19898714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.